Asian-white disparities in obstetric anal sphincter injury: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meejin Park1, Susitha Wanigaratne2, Rohan D'Souza3,4

  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Global Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Plos One
|September 8, 2023
PubMed

Insights

This systematic review investigates obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) in high-income countries. It hypothesizes a higher incidence of OASI in Asian versus white birthing individuals, aiming to inform equitable obstetric care.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Disparities Research

Background:

  • Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) affects 4.4%–6.0% of vaginal births in Canada.
  • Existing research indicates a higher OASI risk in Asian versus white individuals in high-income countries.
  • This protocol details a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify this disparity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of OASI in Asian versus white birthing individuals in high-income countries.
  • To hypothesize a higher pooled incidence of OASI in Asian compared to white birthing individuals.
  • To inform potential disparities in obstetric care and outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic search of MEDLINE, OVID, Embase, Emcare, and Cochrane databases (inception–2022).
  • Inclusion of observational studies using keywords related to race, ethnicity, and OASI.
  • Meta-analysis using RevMan with random effects model and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous data; subgroup analysis by Asian ethnicity.

Main Results:

  • The study aims to synthesize extant literature to estimate OASI rates in Asian and white populations.
  • It will calculate the relative risk of OASI between these two ethnic groups in non-Asian, high-income settings.
  • The expected outcome is to provide quantitative evidence on the incidence disparity.

Conclusions:

  • Findings will illuminate health outcome discrepancies between Asian and white birthing individuals.
  • Results may advocate for research into causal mechanisms like differential care and systemic racism.
  • The review aims to inform obstetric care guidelines for equitable and accessible healthcare for diverse populations.
Abstract