Progression of Enteral Feeding Volumes in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in the "Connection Trial"

Josef Neu1, Patricia Ashley2, Vikas Chowdhary3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida Health Shands Children's Hospital, Gainesville, Florida.

PubMed

Insights

Feeding progression in premature infants is highly variable and influenced by clinical factors. Lower birth weight, gestational age, and Apgar scores are associated with slower enteral feeding advancement.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Nutrition

Background:

  • Premature infants require careful nutritional support.
  • Enteral feeding advancement is a critical aspect of neonatal intensive care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate daily feeding volumes and their association with clinical variables in premature infants.
  • To analyze the progression of enteral feeding in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 641 infants with birth weight 510-1000g and gestational age 27 weeks.
  • Utilized uni- and multivariable Cox regression models to assess associations.
  • Examined total daily enteral (TDE) feeding volumes (10-120 mL/kg/d) and 24 clinical variables.

Main Results:

  • Feeding volumes were highly variable, with a median daily increase of 11 mL/kg/d.
  • Gastrointestinal and respiratory serious adverse events, along with hypotension, were associated with a lower chance of reaching feeding targets.
  • Increased gestational age, birth weight, and Apgar scores correlated with an 8-20% increased chance of reaching feeding volumes.

Conclusions:

  • Enteral feeding progression in ELBW infants is variable and cautious.
  • Clinical factors significantly influence the rate of feeding advancement.
  • The observed feeding progression was slower than typically recommended in feeding protocols.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding01:15

Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding

Enteral nutrition encompasses various methods of delivering nutrition directly to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, bypassing traditional oral intake. It is particularly beneficial for patients who cannot eat by mouth but have a functioning digestive system. Key methods include nasointestinal feeding, gastrostomy, and jejunostomy, each suited to different clinical scenarios based on the patient's needs and condition.
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
199
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding01:26

Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding

Enteral nutrition delivers nutrients directly to the stomach or small intestine through a tube. This method is appropriate for patients who cannot eat but still have a functioning digestive system. It is also beneficial for individuals with swallowing difficulties, anorexia, malabsorption, or those who have undergone gastrointestinal (GI) surgery.
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
331
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance00:56

One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance

Clearance is a key pharmacokinetic parameter that quantifies the volume of body fluid from which a drug is entirely removed within a specific time frame. It is crucial in assessing how a drug is eliminated from the body and has critical clinical applications.
In the one-compartment open model for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, clearance is estimated by dividing the elimination rate by the plasma drug concentration. This equation leverages the elimination rate constant and the apparent...
102
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route01:18

Drug Delivery: Enteral Route

The enteral drug administration involves three primary routes: oral, sublingual, and buccal. Oral ingestion is the most prevalent, safe, economical, and convenient method for drug administration. However, it has certain drawbacks, including limited absorption due to the drug's low water solubility or poor membrane permeability, possible emesis from GI mucosa irritation, destruction of drugs by digestive enzymes or low gastric pH, and irregular absorption along with food or other drugs.
499
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Bolus Administration01:18

Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Bolus Administration

The two-compartment model for intravenous (IV) bolus administration illustrates drug distribution in the body, subdividing it into central and peripheral compartments. This model operates on the concept of two-compartment kinetics. The drug's plasma concentration shows a bi-exponential decline following IV bolus administration, signaling the presence of two disposition processes: distribution and elimination.
The disparity between drug input and the sum of drug transfer rates between...
572
Gastric Emptying01:16

Gastric Emptying

Gastric emptying occurs when the stomach gradually releases chyme into the duodenum. When the stomach is distended, it triggers the release of gastrin, a hormone that promotes gastric acid secretion to aid in digestion. Additionally, stomach distension contributes to peristaltic waves that propel gastric contents toward the pyloric region. The gastroenteric reflex, on the other hand, primarily stimulates peristalsis in the intestines, facilitating the movement of contents further along the...
905