Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Coronary No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Current Knowledge on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis,
Gjin Ndrepepa1, Adnan Kastrati1,2
1Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.
Insights
Coronary no-reflow (CNR) is a common complication after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) reperfusion therapy. Current therapies do not prevent or reverse CNR, highlighting an unmet need in STEMI treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Research
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary no-reflow (CNR) is a frequent complication following reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Microvascular obstruction (MVO) due to ischemia, embolization, and reperfusion injury is the primary mechanism of CNR.
- CNR negatively impacts the benefits of reperfusion therapy, leading to adverse left ventricular remodeling, heart failure, and reduced survival.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and clinical implications of coronary no-reflow (CNR) in STEMI patients.
- To highlight the limitations of current diagnostic tools and the lack of effective therapies for CNR.
- To emphasize the ongoing research into preventing and alleviating MVO and CNR.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on coronary no-reflow (CNR) and microvascular obstruction (MVO) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Comparison of diagnostic modalities, including coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.
- Analysis of the impact of CNR/MVO on clinical outcomes and the effectiveness of current therapeutic strategies.
Main Results:
- CNR is dynamic, developing over hours and persisting for weeks after reperfusion.
- Coronary angiography underestimates CNR frequency, while CMR imaging is highly sensitive for MVO detection, localization, and extent, also identifying intramyocardial hemorrhage and estimating infarct size.
- Despite research targeting known mechanisms, no therapy consistently prevents or reverses CNR and improves clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.
Conclusions:
- Microvascular obstruction (MVO) and coronary no-reflow (CNR) significantly negate reperfusion benefits in STEMI, contributing to poor prognosis.
- Effective prevention or reversal of MVO and CNR remains a critical unmet therapeutic goal in STEMI management.
- Continued research is essential to address the challenges posed by MVO and CNR in STEMI patients undergoing reperfusion therapy.
Abstract:
Coronary no-reflow (CNR) is a frequent phenomenon that develops in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) following reperfusion therapy. CNR is highly dynamic, develops gradually (over hours) and persists for days to weeks after reperfusion. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) developing as a consequence of myocardial ischemia, distal embolization and reperfusion-related injury is the main pathophysiological mechanism of CNR. The frequency of CNR or MVO after primary PCI differs widely depending on the sensitivity of the tools used for diagnosis and timing of examination. Coronary angiography is readily available and most convenient to diagnose CNR but it is highly conservative and underestimates the true frequency of CNR. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the most sensitive method to diagnose MVO and CNR that provides information on the presence, localization and extent of MVO. CMR imaging detects intramyocardial hemorrhage and accurately estimates the infarct size. MVO and CNR markedly negate the benefits of reperfusion therapy and contribute to poor clinical outcomes including adverse remodeling of left ventricle, worsening or new congestive heart failure and reduced survival. Despite extensive research and the use of therapies that target almost all known pathophysiological mechanisms of CNR, no therapy has been found that prevents or reverses CNR and provides consistent clinical benefit in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion. Currently, the prevention or alleviation of MVO and CNR remain unmet goals in the therapy of STEMI that continue to be under intense research.
More Related Videos
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Angina IV: Management