Grey matter volume and CSF biomarkers predict neuropsychological subtypes of MCI

Jeremy Lefort-Besnard1, Mikael Naveau2, Nicolas Delcroix2

  • 1Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, COMETE, Caen, France.

Neurobiology of Aging
|September 9, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Researchers identified three distinct subgroups within mild cognitive impairment (MCI) using neuropsychological assessments. These subtypes show unique patterns of neurodegeneration and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, aiding clinical and biological understanding.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Biomarker Research

Background:

  • Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is increasingly recognized as heterogeneous.
  • Understanding distinct MCI subtypes is crucial for targeted research and interventions.
  • Neuropsychological profiles may correlate with underlying neurodegenerative patterns and biomarker changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if neuropsychologically-defined subtypes of MCI exhibit distinct patterns of neurodegeneration and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers.
  • To identify specific predictive features differentiating MCI subtypes from cognitively normal (CN) controls.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from 640 participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database.
  • Applied clustering analysis to neuropsychological data to identify distinct MCI subgroups.
  • Employed classification modeling to identify predictive features differentiating subgroups, including CSF Aβ1-42, tau, and grey matter atrophy.

Main Results:

  • Successfully discriminated MCI participants into three coherent neuropsychological subgroups: amnestic MCI, mixed MCI, and a cluster-derived normal subgroup.
  • Identified specific biomarkers distinguishing amnestic and mixed MCI from CN controls: CSF Aβ1-42 for amnestic MCI, and CSF Aβ1-42, tau, and temporal/occipital grey matter atrophy for mixed MCI.
  • The cluster-derived normal subgroup showed cognitive, structural, and biomarker profiles indistinguishable from CN controls.

Conclusions:

  • Multimodal neuropsychological subtyping of MCI is clinically and neurobiologically meaningful.
  • Distinct MCI subtypes possess unique neurodegenerative signatures and CSF biomarker profiles.
  • This subtyping approach enhances the understanding of MCI heterogeneity and progression.

Related Concept Videos