Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Kinematic History of a Salient-recess Junction Explored through a Combined Approach of Field Data and Analog Sandbox Modeling
Published on: August 5, 2016
Complex multi-fault rupture and triggering during the 2023 earthquake doublet in southeastern Türkiye.
Chengli Liu1, Thorne Lay2, Rongjiang Wang3,4
1School of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China. liuchengli@cug.edu.cn.
Two major earthquakes in Türkiye were analyzed using seismic and geodetic data. Kinematic models reveal rupture details and stress changes, suggesting the first earthquake may have triggered the second.
Area of Science:
- Geophysics
- Seismology
- Tectonics
Background:
- The February 6, 2023, earthquakes (MW 7.8 and MW 7.7) on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) caused catastrophic damage and fatalities.
- The EAFZ is a major left-lateral strike-slip fault system in a seismically active region.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive kinematic rupture models for the two major earthquakes.
- To understand the rupture dynamics, including speed, slip distribution, and fault interaction.
- To assess the role of stress transfer in triggering the earthquake doublet.
Main Methods:
- Inversion of extensive seismic and geodetic observations.
- Development of complex 5-6 segment fault models.
- Constraining models with satellite observations and relocated aftershocks.
Main Results:
- The MW 7.8 event initiated on a splay fault and propagated ~350 km along the main EAFZ strand with slip up to 8.1 m and speeds of 2.5-4.5 km/s.
- The MW 7.7 event ruptured ~160 km along the northern EAFZ strand, exhibiting initial supershear rupture velocities (>4 km/s) followed by slower speeds (~3 km/s).
- Coulomb stress analysis suggests the first event likely triggered the second and loaded adjacent faults.
Conclusions:
- Detailed kinematic models provide insights into the complex rupture processes of the EAFZ earthquakes.
- The findings highlight the significant role of static stress changes in the triggering of sequential large earthquakes.
- Understanding these rupture dynamics is crucial for seismic hazard assessment in the region.
More Related Videos
09:53Predicting Catalyst Extrudate Breakage Based on the Modulus of Rupture
Published on: May 13, 2018
09:26In Situ Time-dependent Dielectric Breakdown in the Transmission Electron Microscope: A Possibility to Understand the Failure Mechanism in Microelectronic Devices
Published on: June 26, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Fault Types
For line-to-line faults occurring between phases B and C, the...
Reclosers and Fuses
A comprehensive protection scheme for radial distribution...
Power System Three-Phase Short Circuits
Directional Relays
Line Protection with Impedance Relays
Under normal conditions, low load currents keep the measured...
Radial System Protection
In a radial system with a fault downstream of the third breaker, ideally, only the third breaker will open, isolating the fault and interrupting the load connected beyond it. The second breaker has a longer delay setting,...