Intrauterine devices in the management of postpartum hemorrhage

Obstetrical hemorrhage is a relatively frequent obstetrical complication and a common cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. The majority of maternal deaths attributable to hemorrhage are preventable, thus, developing rapid and effective means of treating postpartum hemorrhage is of critical public health importance. Intrauterine devices are one option for managing refractory hemorrhage, with rapid expansion of available devices in recent years. Intrauterine packing was historically used for this purpose, with historical cohorts documenting high rates of success. Modern packing materials, including chitosan-covered gauze, have recently been explored with success rates comparable to uterine balloon tamponade in small trials. There are a variety of balloon tamponade devices, both commercial and improvised, available for use. Efficacy of 85.9% was cited in a recent meta-analysis in resolution of hemorrhage with the use of uterine balloon devices, with greatest success in the setting of atony. However, recent randomized trials have demonstrated potential harm associated with improvised balloon tamponade use In low resource settings and the World Health Organization recommends use be restricted to settings where monitoring is available and care escalation is possible. Recently, intrauterine vacuum devices have been introduced, which offer a new mechanism for achieving hemorrhage control by mechanically restoring uterine tone via vacuum suction. The Jada device, which is is FDA-cleared and commercially available in the US, found successful bleeding control in 94% of cases in an initial single-arm trial, with recent post marketing registry study described treatment success following hemorrhage in 95.8% of vaginal and 88.2% of cesarean births. Successful use of improvised vacuum devices has been described in several studies, including suction tube uterine tamponade via Levin tubing, and use of a modified Bakri balloon. Further research is needed with head-to-head comparisons of efficacy of devices and assessment of cost within the context of both device pricing and overall healthcare resource utilization.