Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Rapid High-throughput Species Identification of Botanical Material Using Direct Analysis in Real Time High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
Published on: October 2, 2016
Cannabis profiling of seized samples: An intra-location variability study using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
Amorn Slosse1,2, Filip Van Durme2, Nele Samyn2
1Department of Analytical Chemistry, Applied Chemometrics and Molecular Modelling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Illicit cannabis profiling using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) shows significant improvement with log transformation data pretreatment. However, false positive rates remain too high for reliable court defense.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Science
- Analytical Chemistry
- Pharmacognosy
Background:
- Cannabis is a globally seized drug, necessitating reliable profiling for judicial investigations.
- Natural heterogeneity of cannabis complicates accurate comparison of seized herbal material.
- Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is utilized for cannabinoid profiling.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of data pretreatment methods in reducing false positives (FPs) during illicit cannabis profiling.
- To establish decision thresholds for comparing seized cannabis samples based on cannabinoid profiles.
- To assess the variability within and between cannabis cultivation locations.
Main Methods:
- Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to generate cannabinoid profiles.
- Pearson correlation coefficients and confidence limits (95% and 99%) were applied to intra-location samples.
- Log transformation was investigated as a data pretreatment method to minimize FP rates.
- A combined data matrix of all seized samples was constructed to improve model representativeness.
Main Results:
- Log transformation pretreatment significantly decreased FP rates compared to internal standard normalization.
- Initial dataset (97 samples) showed FP reduction from 38%/45% to 17%/22%.
- Combined dataset (all samples) with log transformation improved FP rates from 58%/64% to 21%/26%.
Conclusions:
- Data pretreatment, particularly log transformation, substantially enhances the ability to distinguish seized cannabis samples.
- Despite improvements, the current FP rate is not sufficiently low for definitive legal defense.
- Further refinement of analytical methods is required to achieve legally defensible cannabis profiling.
More Related Videos
05:31Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Paired with Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction as a Forensic Tool
Published on: May 25, 2021
05:29Profiling Volatile Compounds in Blackcurrant Fruit using Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Coupled to Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 9, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...
Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)
A gas chromatograph consists of a long, narrow capillary column with a polysiloxane coating on the inner wall....
Gas Chromatography: Introduction
In GC, a sample is vaporized and mixed with an inert carrier gas (the mobile phase), which transports it through a...