Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.5K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

140
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
140
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance01:20

Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance

83
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
83
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

110
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
110

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Natural climate-change-related crises: a systematic review of organizational and community preparedness and resilience.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Expanding Bevacizumab-Erlotinib Therapy Through Fumarate Hydratase Deficiency Screening and Drug Target Pathway Analysis in Papillary Morphology Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

European urology·2026
Same author

Molecular profiling unveils genetic complexity and identifies potential new driver mechanisms in head and neck paragangliomas.

Genes & diseases·2025
Same author

Understanding the Impact of Personal Resources on Emotional Exhaustion Among Emergency Healthcare Workers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Feasibility and usability study of the ERES: A mobile application to intervene in emotional regulation and self-efficacy in minors with type 1 diabetes.

Digital health·2025
Same author

Capturing shared fNIRS responses to visual affective stimuli in young healthy women.

Biological psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Error orientation in a decision-making simulation program: differences between promotion vs. prevention focus.

Alicia Arenas1,2, Elena Briones3, Carmen Tabernero2,4

  • 1Department of Social Psychology, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

Frontiers in Psychology
|September 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Understanding how employees react to errors is key for innovation. This study found that an error prevention frame slowed decision-making, while individual error orientation impacted overall performance in complex tasks.

Keywords:
decision-makingerror orientationprevention focuspromotion focussimulation program

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Organizational Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Work environments increasingly demand adaptive learning from errors and setbacks.
  • Previous research suggests errors can boost motivation, creativity, and problem-solving, but this is influenced by individual and contextual factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally analyze how error promotion versus error prevention frames affect performance and decision-making in a complex simulation.
  • To investigate the role of individual attitude towards errors in these processes.

Main Methods:

  • An experimental design with 40 employees from a Spanish transportation company.
  • Participants completed an Error Orientation questionnaire.
  • Assigned to either an error promotion or error prevention condition for a complex decision-making simulation task.

Main Results:

  • Individual error orientation, particularly risk-taking and communication, correlated with final performance.
  • The experimental condition significantly influenced decision-making time after negative feedback and overall task completion time.
  • The error prevention frame led to significantly longer task completion times.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences in error orientation play a role in performance within complex tasks.
  • Framing (promotion vs. prevention) impacts decision-making speed, with prevention frames potentially hindering progress.
  • The optimal frame likely depends on the specific demands of the task, balancing flexibility with certainty.