Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025
Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Detection and classification of breast lesions using multiple information on contrast-enhanced mammography by a
Yuqian Chen1, Zhen Hua1, Fan Lin2
1School of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.
Objective:
Accurate detection and classification of breast lesions in early stage is crucial to timely formulate effective treatments for patients. We aim to develop a fully automatic system to detect and classify breast lesions using multiple contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images.
Methods:
In this study, a total of 1,903 females who underwent CEM examination from three hospitals were enrolled as the training set, internal testing set, pooled external testing set and prospective testing set. Here we developed a CEM-based multiprocess detection and classification system (MDCS) to perform the task of detection and classification of breast lesions. In this system, we introduced an innovative auxiliary feature fusion (AFF) algorithm that could intelligently incorporates multiple types of information from CEM images. The average free-response receiver operating characteristic score (AFROC-Score) was presented to validate system's detection performance, and the performance of classification was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Furthermore, we assessed the diagnostic value of MDCS through visual analysis of disputed cases, comparing its performance and efficiency with that of radiologists and exploring whether it could augment radiologists' performance.
Results:
On the pooled external and prospective testing sets, MDCS always maintained a high standalone performance, with AFROC-Scores of 0.953 and 0.963 for detection task, and AUCs for classification were 0.909 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.822-0.996] and 0.912 (95% CI: 0.840-0.985), respectively. It also achieved higher sensitivity than all senior radiologists and higher specificity than all junior radiologists on pooled external and prospective testing sets. Moreover, MDCS performed superior diagnostic efficiency with an average reading time of 5 seconds, compared to the radiologists' average reading time of 3.2 min. The average performance of all radiologists was also improved to varying degrees with MDCS assistance.
Conclusions:
MDCS demonstrated excellent performance in the detection and classification of breast lesions, and greatly enhanced the overall performance of radiologists.
