Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Improving Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Surgical Accuracy and Efficiency Through Advanced Puncture Techniques
Published on: August 9, 2024
A novel radiological assessment to identify acute vertebral compression fractures: A pilot observational study
Keisuke Tsuruta1, Toru Ueyama1, Tomoo Watanabe1
1Department of Emergency Minaminara General Medical Center Yoshino Japan.
Aim:
The diagnosis of acute vertebral compression fractures (AVCFs) is often challenging. An alternative to magnetic resonance imaging, which may not always be available, includes a comparison of supine and sitting/standing position radiographs. However, this cannot be accomplished in patients with acute vertebral compression fractures who require emergency transport and are in severe pain. In this study, aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of comparing lateral-view radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine in supine and 30° head-elevated positions, which are less painful.
Methods:
We retrospectively examined 30 patients with AVCFs who were transported by ambulance to our emergency department between June 2018 and May 2019. All underwent 30° head-elevated lateral-view thoracolumbar spine radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. We evaluated vertebral fractures by examining changes in vertebral wedging ratio (WR) from supine to 30° head-elevated position (Δ WR) using the following equation: Δ WR = WR (30° head-elevated) - WR (supine). We compared Δ WR to that of unfractured vertebrae as control.
Results:
A total of 176 vertebrae were included (fractured, 32 and non-fractured, 144). Δ WR of fractured vertebrae ranged between 5.1% and 24.4%, whereas non-fractured vertebrae ranged between -6.7% and 4.3%. Median Δ WR of fractured vertebrae was significantly higher than non-fractured vertebrae (12.6% versus -0.5%, p < 0.001). No patients reported pain during 30° head-elevated positioning.
Conclusions:
Lateral radiographs in supine and 30° head-elevated positions can accurately diagnose of AVCF, without worsening pain. This study showed a Δ WR value of ≥5.1% for AVCFs.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
X-ray Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

