Association Between Sebum, Total Cholesterol, and Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels With Post-acne...

Background Prolonged acne inflammation causes scar formation, one of which is post-acne keloids. Sebum, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level can influence post-acne keloids. This study aims to determine the association between sebum, total cholesterol, and LDL levels with post-acne keloids to better define the predisposing factors for this condition. Methods This study used primary data involving sociodemographics, clinical features, keloid classification, sebum levels, total cholesterol levels, and LDL levels in post-acne keloid patients at the Dermatology, Venereology, and Aesthetics Outpatient Clinics of Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang, Indonesia. Study samples were patients who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria by consecutive sampling. The data then underwent univariate and bivariate analyses to show the association between variables. Result A total of 22 patients with post-acne keloids participated. The subjects presented mostly with major keloids based on the classification (59.1%). The patients were predominantly 21-30 years old (50%) and male (90.9%). The keloids had onsets >six months to one year (45.5%), durations of one to five years (77.3%), and multiple presentations (68.2%). Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) assessment showed mainly red vascularity (40.9%), mixed pigmentation (68.2%), >5 mm keloid height (59.1%), and firm pliability (40.9%). Most patients presented with pruritus (86.4%) but without pain (54.5%). Most had low levels of sebum (50%), normal total cholesterol (90.9%), and near-optimal LDL level (40.9%). There were no significant association between sebum (p = 1.000), total cholesterol (p = 1.000), and LDL (p = 0.376) levels with post-acne keloids. However, LDL levels above normal were most found in this study (68.2%). Conclusions There is no association between sebum, total cholesterol, and LDL levels with post-acne keloids. Despite the fact that LDL level was not statistically significant, there has been a rise in LDL level in the research subjects. Further research with a larger number of subjects and consideration of multicenter study through retrospective/prospective methods and complete lipid profile examinations is still required to provide a more representative study.