Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Navigating MARRVEL, a Web-Based Tool that Integrates Human Genomics and Model Organism Genetics Information
Published on: August 15, 2019
Tractable limitations of current polygenic scores do not excuse genetically confounded social science
Damien Morris1, Stuart J Ritchie1, Alexander I Young2,3
1Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, UK damien.morris@kcl.ac.uk https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/damien-morris stuart.j.ritchie@kcl.ac.uk https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/stuart-ritchie.
Abstract:
Burt's critique of using polygenic scores in social science conflates the "scientific costs" of sociogenomics with "sociopolitical and ethical" concerns. Furthermore, she paradoxically enlists recent advances in controlling for environmental confounding to argue such confounding is scientifically "intractable." Disinterested social scientists should support ongoing efforts to improve this technology rather than obstructing progress and excusing genetically confounded research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Polygenic Traits
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Punnett Squares
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...

