Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors
Published on: January 25, 2018
Burt uses a fallacious motte-and-bailey argument to dispute the value of genetics for social science
Brendan P Zietsch1, Abdel Abdellaoui2, Karin J H Verweij2
1Centre for Psychology and Evolution, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia zietsch@psy.uq.edu.auhttps://psychology.uq.edu.au/profile/2404/brendan-zietsch.
Abstract:
Burt's argument relies on a motte-and-bailey fallacy. Burt aims to argue against the value of genetics for social science; instead she argues against certain interpretations of a specific kind of genetics tool, polygenic scores (PGSs). The limitations, previously identified by behavioural geneticists including ourselves, do not negate the value of PGSs, let alone genetics in general, for social science.
Related Concept Videos
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Incomplete Dominance
Epistasis Analysis
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Inheritance
Each gene exists in pairs, and the combination of these genes from both parents forms an individual's genotype. This genotype is a blueprint of potential traits. Examples of genotype...
Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance

