Cardiometabolic risk factor clustering in persons with spinal cord injury: A principal component analysis approach

Shawn K Gilhooley1, William A Bauman1,2,3, Michael F La Fountaine1,4,5

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research & Development Service National Center for the Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.

PubMed

Insights

Principal component analysis identified distinct cardiometabolic (CM) risk factors in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) compared to healthy controls. These CM factors significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the SCI population.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Metabolic Health
  • Rehabilitation Medicine

Background:

  • Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is elevated in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).
  • Understanding the clustering of cardiometabolic (CM) risk factors specific to SCI is crucial for targeted prevention strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify CM measurements that cluster together to confer increased CVD risk in individuals with chronic SCI.
  • To compare these CM clusters with those found in healthy non-SCI individuals using principal component analysis (PCA).

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study involving 98 men with chronic SCI and 51 healthy controls.
  • Fasting blood samples were analyzed for CM biomarkers (lipids, glucose, insulin, leptin, adiponectin, inflammation markers).
  • Total body fat (TBF) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were measured using DXA; PCA was applied to identify CM clusters.

Main Results:

  • PCA identified six factor-components (FC) explaining substantial variance in both SCI (77%) and non-SCI (82%) groups.
  • FC-1, primarily lipoprotein particle concentrations, significantly increased the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS), 10-yr. CVD risk score (FRS), and HOMA2-IR in the SCI cohort.
  • TBF and VAT clustered with CM markers in FC-2 for the SCI group, but not in the non-SCI group.

Conclusions:

  • PCA effectively identified distinct CM risk factor clusters in SCI and non-SCI individuals.
  • The clustering of CM variables differs significantly between SCI and non-SCI cohorts.
  • These findings suggest that CM outcomes play a differential role in CVD risk for individuals with chronic SCI, necessitating tailored approaches.
Abstract