Classic Bladder Exstrophy Closure Without Osteotomy or Immobilization: An Exercise in Futility?
Ahmad Haffar1, Alexander M Hirsch1, Christian C Morrill1
1Robert D. Jeffs Division of Pediatric Urology, James Buchanan Brady Urological Institutions, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Charlotte Bloomberg Children's Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Objective:
To review the outcomes of classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) closure without the use of osteotomy or lower extremity/pelvic immobilization.
Methods:
A prospectively maintained institutional approved exstrophy-epispadias complex database of 1487 patients was reviewed for patients with CBE who had undergone closure without osteotomy nor immobilization. All patients were referred to the authors' institution for reconstruction later in life or for failed closure.
Results:
Of a total of 1016 CBE patients, 56 closure events were identified that met inclusion with a total of 47 unique patients. Thirty-eight closures were completed prior to 1990 (67.9%). Forty-five closure events developed eventual failure (45/56, 80.4%) (Table 1). Thirteen closure events were secondary closures (13/56, 23.2%). The primary closure failure rate was 83.7% (36/43) while the secondary closure failure rate was 69.2% (9/13). Failures were attributed to one or more of dehiscence, bladder prolapse, and vesicocutaneous fistula (25/45, 55.6%) (23/45, 51.1%) (6/45, 13.3%), respectively. Thirty-seven patients developed social continence (37/47, 78.7%), while only 8 patients developed spontaneous voided continence (7/47,17.0%) (Table 2). The most common methods of voiding were continent catheterizable channels (25/47, 53.2%) of which all were socially continent.
Conclusion:
These results illustrate the critical role osteotomy and postoperative immobilization can play in both primary and secondary exstrophy closure. While this is a historical case series, the authors believe that these results remain relevant to contemporary exstrophy surgeons.
