Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
Published on: February 7, 2025
A comparative analysis of Sigma metrics using conventional and alternative formulas
Kamil Taha Uçar1, Abdulkadir Çat2
1Health Science University, Istanbul Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
Comparing Sigma Metrics (SM) for analytical performance evaluation, this study found that the choice of tolerance range significantly impacts results. Laboratories must select the appropriate method based on quality objectives and analyte characteristics.
Area of Science:
- Clinical chemistry
- Analytical performance evaluation
- Quality management systems
Background:
- Six Sigma (SM) is widely used for assessing clinical laboratory analytical performance.
- The conventional SM formula uses total allowable error (TEa) and bias, but its suitability is debated.
- An alternative SM formula using within-subject biological variation (CVI) as the tolerance range (TR) has been proposed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To calculate and compare Sigma Metric (SM) values using both conventional and alternative formulas.
- To evaluate the impact of different tolerance range (TR) definitions on analytical performance assessment.
- To determine the suitability of SM formulas for clinical chemistry parameters.
Main Methods:
- Twenty clinical chemistry parameters were analyzed.
- SM values were computed using the conventional formula with CLIA and biological variation (BV) TEa goals.
- SM values were also calculated using the alternative formula with CVI as TR.
- Intermediate precision (CVA%) and bias data were sourced from quality control and external quality assessment reports.
Main Results:
- Using the conventional formula, 11 SM values (CLIA TEa) and 21 SM values (BV TEa) were unacceptable (SM < 3).
- Twenty-two SM values calculated with the alternative formula were also below 3.
- A significant impact of the chosen TR on assessed analytical performance was observed.
Conclusions:
- The definition of tolerance range (TR) substantially influences the evaluation of analytical performance.
- Laboratories must carefully select the appropriate SM formula and TR based on specific quality goals, analyte properties, and operational context.
- This highlights the need for critical assessment of quality metrics in clinical laboratories.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Standard Deviation
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics
One of...

