Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Standardizing the Development of Amine-Based Silica Composites as CO2 Adsorbents for Direct Air Capture
Published on: September 29, 2023
Comparison of the novel membrane-based carbon dioxide filter memsorb™ with a chemical granulate absorbent using a
Ruediger R Noppens1, Farzad Izaddoust Dar2, Sujoy Banik2
1Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, LHSC, University Hospital, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6G 2V4, Canada. rnoppens@uwo.ca.
Purpose:
Memsorb™ is a novel device for carbon dioxide (CO2) removal from anesthesia circuits via a semipermeable polymeric membrane. We evaluated the performance of the memsorb device for the removal of CO2 in an Aisys™ CS2 machine and compared it with a standard chemical granulate absorber (CGA) using a high-fidelity lung simulator.
Methods:
We used an in vitro lung simulator (DUCt) to control CO2 release by imitating alveolar gas exchange. The ventilator settings were identical for all measurements. The fresh gas flow (FGF) was randomized to either 0.5 L·min-1 or 2 L·min-1, completing three trials for each FGF for either memsorb or CGA. The EtCO2 and FICO2 levels were recorded for 30 min in each setting.
Results:
EtCO2 was comparable between the groups with 2 L·min-1 FGF over the observation period. FICO2 was significantly higher in the memsorb group during the trial (2 L·min-1; 3.9 mm Hg; 95% CI, 4.4 to 3.3; P < 0.001). EtCO2 with 0.5 L·min-1 FGF was higher with memsorb than with CGA over the observation period (3.7 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.7 to 4.7; P = 0.004). With 0.5 L·min-1 FGF, FICO2 was significantly higher in the memsorb group compared with CGA over the whole observation period (6 mm Hg; 95% CI, 6.4 to 5.5; P < 0.001).
Discussion:
CO2 was successfully removed from the anesthesia circuit. FICO2 was significantly higher with memsorb throughout the observation period. Nevertheless, the clinical impact of these observations remains unclear. Further clinical trials are required to determine the utility of the novel device.

