Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

07:31
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
7.1K
Validation of machine-learning model for first-trimester prediction of pre-eclampsia using cohort from PREVAL study
M M Gil1,2, D Cuenca-Gómez1,2, V Rolle1,3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain.
Summary
A new artificial intelligence model effectively screens for pre-eclampsia (PE) in the first trimester, showing similar performance to existing methods across different populations. Adjustments for biochemical testing analyzers are crucial for accurate results in diverse settings.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Biomarker Analysis
Background:
- First-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia (PE) traditionally uses competing-risks models combining maternal history and biomarker multiples of the median (MoM).
- Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a novel approach using machine-learning (ML) models that may bypass the need for MoM conversion, potentially simplifying screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cross-population applicability of a previously developed ML-based first-trimester PE screening model.
- To compare the performance of the ML model against a standard competing-risks model in a diverse population.
Main Methods:
- A fully connected neural network ML model, trained on UK data (maternal factors, MAP, UtA-PI, PlGF, PAPP-A), was applied to a Spanish cohort (10,110 pregnancies).
- Screening performance was assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC) and Detection Rate (DR) at a 10% screen-positive rate (SPR).
- Adjustments were made for differences in PlGF analyzer usage between the UK and Spanish cohorts using linear regression.
Main Results:
- The ML model achieved comparable performance to the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing-risks model.
- Detection rates at 10% SPR for early, preterm, and all PE were 84.4%, 77.8%, and 55.7% respectively, with AUCs of 0.920, 0.913, and 0.846.
- The model demonstrated effectiveness without population-specific adaptations, though analyzer adjustments were necessary for PlGF.
Conclusions:
- A neural network-based ML model provides effective first-trimester PE screening applicable across different populations.
- Analyzer adjustments for biochemical testing are essential prior to implementing the ML model in new populations.
- The ML model shows promise for improving PE screening accuracy and accessibility globally.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
The...
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
The...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...

