Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of multiregion brain cell count data.

eLife·2025
Same author

Modeling nonlinear oscillator networks using physics-informed hybrid reservoir computing.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Competition effects regulating the composition of the microRNA pool.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2025
Same author

GlyT2-Positive Interneurons Regulate Timing and Variability of Information Transfer in a Cerebellar-Behavioral Loop.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Signatures of Bayesian inference emerge from energy-efficient synapses.

eLife·2024
Same author

Beyond the limitations of any imaginable mechanism: Large language models and psycholinguistics.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy
11:15

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy

Published on: June 27, 2013

33.8K

Bayesian analysis of phase data in EEG and MEG.

Sydney Dimmock1, Cian O'Donnell1,2, Conor Houghton1

  • 1Faculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Elife
|September 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a Bayesian approach to measure phase coherence in neural recordings like electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). This method offers a more interpretable and data-efficient way to analyze brain activity, requiring fewer participants.

Keywords:
BayesianEEGMEGcircular statisticsfrequency-tagginghumanneurolinguisticsneuroscience

More Related Videos

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.7K
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy
11:15

Applications of EEG Neuroimaging Data: Event-related Potentials, Spectral Power, and Multiscale Entropy

Published on: June 27, 2013

33.8K
Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
08:45

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example

Published on: October 24, 2012

14.7K
Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are crucial non-invasive tools for studying human neural responses due to their temporal precision.
  • EEG and MEG signals are inherently noisy, stemming from both weak neuronal electrodynamics and competing biological processes.
  • Analyzing phase coherence in response to specific frequencies is a common technique to isolate neural signals of interest.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel Bayesian approach for measuring phase coherence in neural recordings.
  • To demonstrate the utility of this Bayesian method in neurolinguistics research.
  • To compare the properties of the Bayesian approach against traditional statistical methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a Bayesian framework for quantifying phase coherence in EEG and MEG data.
  • Applied the Bayesian approach to two neurolinguistic case studies.
  • Utilized simulated data to systematically evaluate the method's performance and properties.

Main Results:

  • The Bayesian approach provides an explicit and interpretable generative model of the data.
  • This method is more data-efficient than traditional statistical approaches.
  • The Bayesian method successfully detects stimulus-related differences with smaller sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian approach offers a more descriptive and interpretable alternative for analyzing phase coherence in neural data.
  • Its enhanced data efficiency makes it suitable for studies with limited participant numbers.
  • This method holds significant potential for advancing research in neuroscience and related fields.