Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

2.8K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
2.8K
Barriers to Effective Communication I01:30

Barriers to Effective Communication I

8.9K
A communication barrier is any distortion or interruption during a conversation, resulting in miscommunication of the message. A good communicator should know these barriers and continuously check for the listener's understanding by obtaining feedback.
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...
8.9K
Barriers to Effective Communication II01:21

Barriers to Effective Communication II

3.7K
The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
3.7K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

2.9K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.9K
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

3.3K
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career...
3.3K
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing01:23

Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing

8.3K
Focusing involves centering a conversation on a message's critical elements or concepts. Focusing is valuable if the talk is vague or patients begin to repeat themselves. Sometimes, when patients are asked about their symptoms, they may go off-topic and try to tell their entire life story. Respectfully, the nurse should bring the conversation back into focus.
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patient-Ventilator Interaction During Noninvasive Ventilation.

Respiratory care·2025
Same author

Maximizing Extubation Outcomes Through Educational and Organizational Research (METEOR) Trial: protocol for a batched, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Author Response: Let It Breathe: Mastering Spontaneous Breathing Trials.

Respiratory care·2024
Same author

AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Patient-Ventilator Assessment.

Respiratory care·2024
Same author

Pulse Oximetry: 2023 Year in Review.

Respiratory care·2024
Same author

Statistics for the Non-Statistician: How to Read the Respiratory Care Literature.

Respiratory care·2024
Same journal

Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding "Comparative Evaluation of Risk Scores for Predicting Postoperative Pulmonary Complications".

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Muscle Dysfunction in Stable COPD: A Multimodal Assessment of Diaphragmatic and Cough-Related Impairment.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Flow Asynchronies During Pressure Support Ventilation in Children: A Bench Model Study.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Inspiratory Effort Assessment Using the Occlusion Pressure-Derived Tension-Time Index.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Clinical Usage of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Across Disease Categories and Care Settings: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Japan.

Respiratory care·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Devices as Analyzed in Lung Models: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Peak Expiratory Flow Data.

Respiratory care·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K

How to Write an Effective Discussion.

Dean R Hess1

  • 1Respiratory Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Lecturer, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. dhess@aarc.org.

Respiratory Care
|September 12, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This guide explains how to write a research paper discussion section. Focus on clearly explaining study results for the reader, emphasizing data interpretation and avoiding common pitfalls.

Keywords:
communicationmanuscriptsmedicalpublishingwriting

More Related Videos

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Writing
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • The discussion section is crucial for interpreting research findings.
  • Effective communication of results aids reader comprehension.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidelines for writing a clear and effective discussion section.
  • To highlight essential elements and common errors in discussion writing.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on explaining the meaning of study results.
  • Emphasize the importance of study data in interpretation.
  • Structure the discussion for reader understanding.

Main Results:

  • Key findings should be clearly articulated.
  • The significance of the data must be explained.
  • Interpretation should directly relate to the presented results.

Conclusions:

  • A well-written discussion enhances the impact of research.
  • Prioritizing the reader ensures effective knowledge transfer.
  • Adhering to best practices improves scientific communication.