Prognosis after splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization vs transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for

Wei-Li Qi1, Jun Wen1,2, Tian-Fu Wen1

  • 1Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China.

Insights

Splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (SPD) offers better survival and lower risks of liver dysfunction and liver cancer compared to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for treating esophagogastric variceal bleeding in hepatitis B cirrhosis patients. Variceal rebleeding rates were similar between the two treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) is a severe complication in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
  • Splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization (SPD) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are established treatments for EGVB.
  • Comparative data on the efficacy and safety of SPD versus TIPS for EGVB in HBV-related cirrhosis is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the long-term prognosis of SPD versus TIPS in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis and acute EGVB.
  • To evaluate overall survival, variceal rebleeding (VRB) rates, liver function, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence after SPD and TIPS.
  • To assess treatment outcomes following endoscopic therapy failure or as secondary prophylaxis for VRB.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 318 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis and EGVB.
  • Propensity score-matched analysis (PSM) to control for confounding factors.
  • Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to compare survival, VRB, liver function, and HCC incidence.

Main Results:

  • After PSM, SPD was associated with significantly better overall survival (P=0.01).
  • SPD demonstrated lower rates of abnormal liver function (P<0.001) and HCC incidence (P=0.02) compared to TIPS.
  • No significant difference in variceal rebleeding (VRB) rates was observed between the SPD and TIPS groups (P=0.09).

Conclusions:

  • SPD is associated with superior postoperative survival and reduced risks of liver dysfunction and HCC compared to TIPS for EGVB management in HBV-related cirrhosis.
  • Both SPD and TIPS are effective in preventing recurrent variceal bleeding, with no significant difference between the two procedures.
  • SPD may offer a better quality of survival for patients undergoing treatment for acute EGVB or secondary prophylaxis of VRB.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management01:28

Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management

Esophageal varices often manifest as gastrointestinal bleeding episodes, presenting symptoms like hematemesis (vomiting of blood), hematochezia (passing fresh blood via the rectum), and melena (black, tarry stools). Other signs can include weight loss, anorexia, abdominal discomfort, jaundice, pruritus, altered mental status, and muscle cramps.
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
94
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction01:24

Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction

Esophageal varices are dilated, tortuous veins which are found mainly in the submucosa of the lower esophagus but which may also appear higher up or extend into the stomach. They develop due to increased pressure in the portal venous system, often as a result of liver cirrhosis. This condition scars and damages the liver, impeding normal blood flow through the portal vein. To compensate, blood seeks alternative pathways, forming fragile new vessels (varices) in the esophagus and stomach. These...
176
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
88
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care01:26

Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

Varicose veins, or varicosities, develop when the valves in the veins, which control blood flow, weaken or damage. It causes blood to pool and the veins to enlarge. Understanding the clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches, and management options for varicose veins is crucial for effective treatment and relief.Clinical manifestationsClinical manifestations of varicose veins include a heavy, achy feeling or pain after prolonged standing or sitting. This discomfort can often be relieved by...
15
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care01:25

Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care

Surgical management and nursing care are crucial in treating Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD). Here is an organized and enhanced overview of the surgical interventions and the associated nursing care for PUD:
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
335
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction01:22

Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction

Esophageal perforation is a severe medical condition characterized by a breach in the integrity of the esophageal wall. This breach can occur due to various factors such as trauma, medical procedures, or underlying diseases. When the esophageal wall is compromised, it allows food, fluids, and digestive juices into the chest cavity or adjacent structures, leading to potential complications and health risks.
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
119