Lipoprotein(a) Testing Trends in a Large Academic Health System in the United States

Harpreet S Bhatia1, Samantha Hurst2, Paresh Desai3

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine University of California San Diego La Jolla CA.

Insights

Lipoprotein(a) testing remains uncommon, even for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study found low and stable testing rates from 2012-2021 across six University of California medical centers.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Clinical Diagnostics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Lipoprotein(a) is a significant cardiovascular risk factor, yet its clinical measurement is infrequent.
  • Systematic quantification of lipoprotein(a) testing prevalence has been lacking.
  • Understanding testing patterns is crucial for improving cardiovascular risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the prevalence of lipoprotein(a) testing.
  • To analyze testing rates across different cardiovascular disease (CVD) conditions.
  • To evaluate testing trends in relation to cardiac diagnostic procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Observational study utilizing data from the University of California Health Data Warehouse (2012-2021).
  • Collected data on unique individuals undergoing lipoprotein(a) testing, CVD diagnoses (ICD-10 codes), and other cardiac testing.
  • Calculated the proportion of individuals tested for lipoprotein(a) overall, by CVD diagnosis, and by cardiac test.

Main Results:

  • Out of 5,553,654 adults, only 18,972 (0.3%) had lipoprotein(a) testing.
  • Testing rates were higher in individuals with ischemic heart disease (2.9%), aortic stenosis (3.1%), family history of CVD (3.3%), stroke (1.7%), and coronary artery calcification (6.1%).
  • Lipoprotein(a) testing was more common with specialized cardiac tests like coronary CT angiography (6.8%) and apolipoprotein B testing (63.0%).

Conclusions:

  • Lipoprotein(a) testing rates remain low, even in patients with diagnosed cardiovascular disease.
  • Testing prevalence showed a slight upward trend but remained relatively stable over the decade.
  • Current testing practices may not fully align with the clinical significance of lipoprotein(a) in CVD risk stratification.