Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A High-throughput Platform for the Screening of Salmonella spp./Shigella spp.
Published on: November 7, 2018
Incidence and Distribution of the Pathogens Causing GI Infections at a University Hospital of Korea
Background:
Gastrointestinal (GI) infections, caused by various pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and parasites, are the second most common infectious diseases. Molecular diagnostics that can simultaneously detect these pathogens are commonly used in syndromic approaches. The authors aimed to identify the causative pathogens of GI infections to provide clinically useful information.
Methods:
This retrospective study used molecular diagnostic methods to determine the incidence and distribution of GI pathogens according to gender, age, and season and analyze their coinfection from August 2020 to December 2022.
Results:
The overall incidence of at least one GI pathogen was 40.1% (991/2, 471). The positivity rates for bacteria and viruses were 33.1% (817/2, 471) and 9.2% (227/2,471), respectively; the positivity rate for bacteria was significantly higher than that for viruses (p < 0.001). The incidence of GI pathogens according to age group was highest in group 3 (59.9%), followed by group 4 (57.0%). The most common bacterial pathogen associated with GI infections was C. difficile, followed by diarrheagenic E. coli, Campylobacter spp., and Salmonella spp. Enteropathogenic E. coli accounted for a large percentage of diarrheagenic E. coli (63.6%, 157/247). Among the viral pathogens, norovirus GI/GII was the most commonly detected virus, followed by adenovirus F40/41 and rotavirus A. For bacterial- or viral-positive cases, the distribution of GI pathogens according to age group showed the highest proportion of C. difficile in all groups, except for group 2. In group 2, rotavirus A accounted for the highest percentage (61.1%, 22/36). The incidence of GI pathogens was the highest in summer (36.1%), followed by autumn (32.7%), and winter (18.0%). The co-infection rate with two or more pathogens was 16.9% (167/991). The rates of co-infection with two or more bacteria, bacteria and viruses, and two viruses were 58.1%, 31.7%, and 10.2%, re-spectively.
Conclusions:
Information on the incidence and distribution of GI pathogens might be clinically useful; however, unlike the distribution of other infectious pathogens, it is necessary to consider that microorganisms identified through molecular diagnostics can be detected even in healthy people without clinical symptoms.
More Related Videos
08:23Culture Methods to Determine the Limit of Detection and Survival in Transport Media of Campylobacter Jejuni in Human Fecal Specimens
Published on: March 10, 2020
05:23Gastric Mucosa Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis for Detecting Helicobacter pylori and Antibiotic Resistance
Published on: March 7, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Infection
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...
Healthcare Associated Infections I: Iatrogenic, Exogenic and Endogenic
HAIs significantly increase the cost of health care. Extended stays in healthcare institutions, increased disability, increased costs of medications, including specialized antibiotics, and prolonged recovery times add to the patient's expenses and the healthcare institution and funding bodies.
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care