Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
A population-based study exploring phenotypic clusters and clinical outcomes in stroke using unsupervised machine
Ralph K Akyea1, George Ntaios2, Evangelos Kontopantelis3,4
1PRISM Research Group, Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Insights
This study identified four distinct patient phenotypes after stroke, revealing varying risks for recurrent stroke and cardiovascular death. These findings suggest personalized care strategies can improve outcomes for stroke survivors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Data Science
Background:
- Stroke patients exhibit diverse clinical, demographic, and biochemical profiles.
- This heterogeneity influences cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality.
- Current care stratification may not fully address individual patient risks post-stroke.
Purpose of the Study:
- To stratify incident stroke patients into distinct phenotypic clusters using a novel approach.
- To evaluate the differential risks of recurrent stroke and other major cardiovascular outcomes among these phenotypes.
- To explore opportunities for improved patient care stratification.
Main Methods:
- Utilized linked UK clinical data (primary care, hospitalizations, death records) for 48,114 adult patients with incident stroke.
- Applied a data-driven clustering analysis (kamila algorithm) to identify patient phenotypes.
- Employed Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate risks for adverse outcomes, including coronary heart disease, recurrent stroke, heart failure, and mortality.
Main Results:
- Identified four distinct stroke patient phenotypes.
- Compared to cluster 1, clusters 2, 3, and 4 showed significantly higher risks for composite recurrent stroke and CVD-related mortality (HRs 1.07-1.44).
- Similar risk trends were observed for recurrent stroke and all-cause mortality, but not consistently for all individual cardiovascular outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Demonstrated successful stratification of heterogeneous stroke patients into four homogenous phenotypes.
- These phenotypes exhibit differential risks for recurrent stroke and major cardiovascular outcomes.
- The findings support revisiting stroke care stratification to enhance patient outcomes.
Abstract:
Individuals developing stroke have varying clinical characteristics, demographic, and biochemical profiles. This heterogeneity in phenotypic characteristics can impact on cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality outcomes. This study uses a novel clustering approach to stratify individuals with incident stroke into phenotypic clusters and evaluates the differential burden of recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes. We used linked clinical data from primary care, hospitalisations, and death records in the UK. A data-driven clustering analysis (kamila algorithm) was used in 48,114 patients aged ≥ 18 years with incident stroke, from 1-Jan-1998 to 31-Dec-2017 and no prior history of serious vascular events. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for subsequent adverse outcomes, for each of the generated clusters. Adverse outcomes included coronary heart disease (CHD), recurrent stroke, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), heart failure, CVD-related and all-cause mortality. Four distinct phenotypes with varying underlying clinical characteristics were identified in patients with incident stroke. Compared with cluster 1 (n = 5,201, 10.8%), the risk of composite recurrent stroke and CVD-related mortality was higher in the other 3 clusters (cluster 2 [n = 18,655, 38.8%]: hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; cluster 3 [n = 10,244, 21.3%]: HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14-1.26; and cluster 4 [n = 14,014, 29.1%]: HR, 1.44; 95% CI: 1.37-1.50). Similar trends in risk were observed for composite recurrent stroke and all-cause mortality outcome, and subsequent recurrent stroke outcome. However, results were not consistent for subsequent risk in CHD, PVD, heart failure, CVD-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. In this proof of principle study, we demonstrated how a heterogenous population of patients with incident stroke can be stratified into four relatively homogenous phenotypes with differential risk of recurrent and major cardiovascular outcomes. This offers an opportunity to revisit the stratification of care for patients with incident stroke to improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
09:21Author Spotlight: Generating Neuronal Phenotypic Profiles - A Protocol to Culture and Image Human Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data