Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
Published on: May 8, 2014
Lower extremity joint power and work during recovery following trip-induced perturbations
Shabnam Shokouhi1, Hossein Mokhtarzadeh2, Peter Vee-Sin Lee1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Background:
Successful recovery following a perturbation during walking depends on a quick well-coordinated response from the body. As such, lower limb joint power and work provide critical information characterizing the success of the recovery after a perturbation. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate lower-limb joint power and the relative contribution of each joint to the total leg work during the recovery following a trip-induced perturbation.
Methods:
Twenty-four young male volunteers walked at 1.1 m/s for 2 min, followed by two unexpected perturbations induced by rapidly decelerating the right belt of the split-belt treadmill. Joint moments and powers were calculated using an inverse dynamic approach. Joint work was found as the integral of joint power with respect to time. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and paired-sample t-tests were used to compare joint power and work between recovery and unperturbed steps.
Results:
Compared to normal walking, recovery from the trip required a significant increase in both positive (+27 %, p < 0.05) and negative(+28 %,p < 0.05) leg work. During unperturbed walking, the ankle was the key contributor to both positive (ankle=50 %, hip=34 %, and knee=15 %) and negative (ankle=62 %, knee=32 %, and hip=6 %) leg work. During recovery, the knee eccentric work significantly increased (+83 %,p < 0.05) making it the main contributor to the negative leg work (knee=46 %, ankle=45 %, and hip=9 %). The hip positive work also increased during recovery (+62.7 %, p < 0.05), while ankle and the knee positive work remained unchanged.
Significance:
These findings highlight the importance of eccentric work of the knee, and concentric work of the hip joint during recovery from trip-induced perturbations. The additional mechanical demand of producing and absorbing more power during recovery is primarily imposed on the knee and hip, rather than the ankle. This new insight into the specific functions of lower-limb joints during recovery from trip-induced perturbations has important implications for the design of targeted fall prevention interventions.
