Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

09:54
Lung Rapid Recovery Procurement Combined with Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Controlled Donation after Circulatory Death
Published on: August 15, 2022
1.8K
Living-donor lobar lung transplantation
1The Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Summary
Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) offers a vital option for critically ill patients facing donor shortages. This procedure demonstrates comparable or superior long-term outcomes to cadaveric lung transplantation, with a 10-year survival rate of 71.6%.
Area of Science:
- Thoracic Surgery
- Transplantation Immunology
- Pulmonary Medicine
Background:
- Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) addresses critical shortages of brain-dead donors for lung transplants.
- It is crucial to ensure voluntary donation without coercion.
- LDLLT involves implanting lobes from two healthy donors into recipients requiring cardiopulmonary support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT).
- To explore alternative surgical techniques when ideal donor matching is unavailable.
- To compare LDLLT outcomes with cadaveric lung transplantation (CLT).
Main Methods:
- Standard LDLLT procedure using right and left lower lobes from two donors.
- Functional and anatomical size matching using pulmonary function tests and 3D CT volumetry.
- Consideration of alternative procedures like single lobe, segmental, or inverted lobar transplants.
Main Results:
- LDLLT is applicable to diverse lung diseases in adult and pediatric patients.
- Postoperative pulmonary function is equivalent to CLT, with potential immunological advantages.
- Long-term outcomes are similar or superior to CLT, with a reported 10-year survival rate of 71.6% in one series.
- Living donors experienced no long-term lifestyle impact, but potential serious morbidity necessitates careful patient selection.
Conclusions:
- LDLLT is a viable and effective alternative to CLT, especially for critically ill patients.
- Careful donor selection and size matching are essential for successful LDLLT.
- The procedure offers comparable or better long-term survival rates and immunological benefits.

