Determinants of response to CDK4/6 inhibitors in the real-world setting
Agnieszka K Witkiewicz1,2, Emily Schultz3, Jianxin Wang3
1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. agnieszka.witkiewicz@roswellpark.org.
Abstract:
Despite widespread use and a known mechanism of action for CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy, features of disease evolution and determinants of therapeutic response in the real-world setting remain unclear. Here, a cohort of patients treated with standard-of-care combination regimens was utilized to explore features of disease and determinants of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In this cohort of 280 patients, >90% of patients were treated with palbociclib in combination with either an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant (FUL). Most of these patients had modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) scores, and ER, HER2, and PR immunohistochemistry. Both the SBR score and lack of PR expression were associated with shorter PFS in patients treated with AI combinations and remained significant in multivariate analyses (HR = 3.86, p = 0.008). Gene expression analyses indicated substantial changes in cell cycle and estrogen receptor signaling during the course of treatment. Furthermore, gene expression-based subtyping indicated that predominant subtypes changed with treatment and progression. The luminal B, HER2, and basal subtypes exhibited shorter PFS in CDK4/6 inhibitor combinations when assessed in the pretreatment biopsies; however, they were not associated with OS. Using unbiased approaches, cell cycle-associated gene sets were strongly associated with shorter PFS in pretreatment biopsies irrespective of endocrine therapy. Estrogen receptor signaling gene sets were associated with longer PFS particularly in the AI-treated cohort. Together, these data suggest that there are distinct pathological and biological features of HR+/HER2- breast cancer associated with response to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Clinical trial registration number: NCT04526587.
Insights
Real-world data show that tumor features like SBR score and PR expression impact CDK4/6 inhibitor effectiveness in breast cancer. Gene expression changes during treatment also predict progression-free survival.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy are standard for HR+/HER2- breast cancer.
- Real-world data on disease evolution and treatment response determinants are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore disease features and determinants of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy.
- To analyze pathological and biological features associated with treatment response.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 280 patients treated with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant (FUL).
- Evaluation of modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) scores and ER, HER2, PR expression.
- Gene expression profiling of pretreatment biopsies and during treatment.
Main Results:
- SBR score and lack of PR expression were linked to shorter PFS in AI combinations (HR=3.86).
- Gene expression revealed changes in cell cycle and estrogen receptor signaling during treatment.
- Luminal B, HER2, and basal subtypes showed shorter PFS but not OS.
- Cell cycle gene sets correlated with shorter PFS; estrogen receptor signaling with longer PFS in AI cohort.
Conclusions:
- Distinct pathological and biological features of HR+/HER2- breast cancer influence response to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
- SBR score, PR expression, and specific gene expression profiles are important predictive markers.
- Understanding these features can optimize treatment strategies for breast cancer.
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Positive Regulator Molecules
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Treatment Resistant Cancers


