Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Treating Semiempirical Hamiltonians as Flexible Machine Learning Models Yields Accurate and Interpretable Results
Frank Hu1, Francis He1, David J Yaron1
1Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States.
Abstract:
Quantum chemistry provides chemists with invaluable information, but the high computational cost limits the size and type of systems that can be studied. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a means to dramatically lower the cost while maintaining high accuracy. However, ML models often sacrifice interpretability by using components such as the artificial neural networks of deep learning that function as black boxes. These components impart the flexibility needed to learn from large volumes of data but make it difficult to gain insight into the physical or chemical basis for the predictions. Here, we demonstrate that semiempirical quantum chemical (SEQC) models can learn from large volumes of data without sacrificing interpretability. The SEQC model is that of density-functional-based tight binding (DFTB) with fixed atomic orbital energies and interactions that are one-dimensional functions of the interatomic distance. This model is trained to ab initio data in a manner that is analogous to that used to train deep learning models. Using benchmarks that reflect the accuracy of the training data, we show that the resulting model maintains a physically reasonable functional form while achieving an accuracy, relative to coupled cluster energies with a complete basis set extrapolation (CCSD(T)*/CBS), that is comparable to that of density functional theory (DFT). This suggests that trained SEQC models can achieve a low computational cost and high accuracy without sacrificing interpretability. Use of a physically motivated model form also substantially reduces the amount of ab initio data needed to train the model compared to that required for deep learning models.
More Related Videos
05:57Author Spotlight: In Silico Creation and Impact of Carbonylated Amino Acids on Protein Structure and Function
Published on: April 26, 2024
10:52Multiscale Sampling of a Heterogeneous Water/Metal Catalyst Interface using Density Functional Theory and Force-Field Molecular Dynamics
Published on: April 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length,...
Simplified Synchronous Machine Model
In this model, each generator is connected to a...
Mechanistic Models: Overview of Compartment Models
Improving Translational Accuracy
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis