The Effect of Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) on the Baroreceptor Reflex (BR)

Introduction Epipharyngeal Abrasive Therapy (EAT) has been used as a treatment for chronic epipharyngitis, and although autonomic nerve stimulation has been pointed out as one of the mechanisms by which EAT produces therapeutic effects, there have been few reports examining this mechanism of action. This study investigated the effects of repeated EAT on autonomic nervous system activity in chronic epipharyngitis patients over time, using heart rate variability analysis. In addition, we conducted a loading test using the active standing test (AS test) to examine the effects of EAT on the baroreceptor reflex (BR). Subjects and methods A retrospective study was conducted on 39 patients who visited our clinic between July 2017 and November 2019 and underwent autonomic function tests with a diagnosis of chronic nasopharyngeal inflammation. The subjects were divided into two groups: the improvement group and the invariant group for comparison. Electrocardiographic recordings and blood pressure measurements were made under the stress of the AS test. Heart rate, high-frequency (HF) component, low-frequency (LF) component, and Coefficient of Variation on R-R interval were evaluated as indices of autonomic function. Component coefficient of variance high frequency was used as an index of parasympathetic function. ccvLF/ccvHF ratio was calculated by dividing the component coefficient of variance low frequency by ccvHF. The AS test was conducted in phase 1 in the initial resting sitting position, in phase 2 in the standing position, in phase 3 in the standing and holding the standing position, and in phase 4 in the seated and holding the sitting position. Systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were obtained in each phase. A paired t-test was used to compare the improved and invariant groups before and after treatment. The post-treatment comparison between the improved group and the invariant group was performed by unpaired t-test. Variation of the evaluation index over time was evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA. Multiple comparisons were corrected by the Bonferroni method. Results The EAT showed that parasympathetic activity was significantly suppressed in the improvement group, while the AS test showed significant fluctuations over time for the improvement and invariant groups. The interaction between the time course and the two factors in the improvement and invariant groups was not statistically evident. Although no significant difference was found, the improvement group showed a tendency to suppress parasympathetic activity and a tendency to stimulate sympathetic activity compared to the invariant group. Blood pressure in the improvement group showed a tendency to decrease. Conclusions EAT was found to suppress parasympathetic activity over time, and the AS test did not reveal an interaction effect of EAT on BR. However, there was a trend toward suppression of parasympathetic activity and stimulation of sympathetic activity in the improved group compared to the invariant group. Blood pressure in the improved group tended to decrease. It is possible that EAT may have a positive effect on autonomic neuropathy symptoms such as orthostatic dysregulation (OD), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), etc. by stimulating the BRs. It is thought that the autonomic nervous system stimulating action and the immune system stimulating action act synergistically to express the therapeutic effect of EAT.