Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
Performing Quality Control on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Liver Fat/Iron Quantification Studies: A Critical
Farid Hajibonabi1, Puneet Sharma, Amir H Davarpanah
1From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for liver fat and iron quantification has high rates of preventable errors. Improving technologist performance and implementing quality control are crucial for accurate nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and iron overload detection.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Quantitative MRI
Background:
- Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and iron overload can progress to cirrhosis.
- Early detection is vital for managing these conditions.
- Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, using chemical shift-encoded sequences and single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS), is key for assessing liver fat and iron content.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate technical quality and identify technologist performance deficiencies in fat/iron MR quantification studies.
- To assess the acceptability of chemical shift-encoded sequences (q-Dixon, IDEAL-IQ) and SVS for liver fat/iron assessment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 87 fat/iron MR studies.
- Evaluation of technical acceptability criteria for q-Dixon/IDEAL-IQ (data handling, coverage, artifacts, motion).
- Assessment of SVS acceptability (data handling, curve-fit, peak separation, peak sharpness).
Main Results:
- 11% of studies had data handling errors (missing maps/sequences).
- 27% of q-Dixon/IDEAL-IQ studies were unacceptable due to incomplete field coverage, artifacts, or motion.
- 28% of SVS sequences were unacceptable due to broad water peaks or poor curve-fits.
Conclusions:
- High rates of preventable errors in fat/iron MR quantification necessitate routine quality control.
- Evaluating technologist performance and addressing technical deficiencies are essential.
- Implementing checklists and routine audits may improve study quality.
More Related Videos
05:37Author Spotlight: A Non-Invasive Tool to Assess and Differentiate Fat Patterns in Liver Using 3D Dixon MRI
Published on: October 20, 2023
08:41Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI