Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
Performing Quality Control on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Liver Fat/Iron Quantification Studies: A Critical
Farid Hajibonabi1, Puneet Sharma, Amir H Davarpanah
1From the Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Objective:
Nonalcoholic fatty liver and iron overload can lead to cirrhosis requiring early detection. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging utilizing chemical shift-encoded sequences and multi-Time of Echo single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS) are frequently used for assessment. The purpose of this study was to assess various quality factors of technical acceptability and any deficiencies in technologist performance in these fat/iron MR quantification studies.
Methods:
Institutional review board waived retrospective quality improvement review of 87 fat/iron MR studies performed over a 6-month period was evaluated. Technical acceptability/unacceptability for chemical shift-encoded sequences (q-Dixon and IDEAL-IQ) included data handling errors (missing maps), liver field coverage, fat/water swap, motion, or other artifacts. Similarly, data handling (missing table/spectroscopy), curve-fit, fat- and water-peak separation, and water-peak sharpness were evaluated for SVS technical acceptability.
Results:
Data handling errors were found in 11% (10/87) of studies with missing maps or entire sequence (SVS or q-Dixon). Twenty-seven percent (23/86) of the q-Dixon/IDEAL-IQ were technically unacceptable (incomplete liver-field [39%], other artifacts [35%], significant/severe motion [18%], global fat/water swap [4%], and multiple reasons [4%]). Twenty-eight percent (21/75) of SVS sequences were unacceptable (water-peak broadness [67%], poor curve-fit [19%] overlapping fat and water peaks [5%], and multiple reasons [9%]).
Conclusions:
A high rate of preventable errors in fat/iron MR quantification studies indicates the need for routine quality control and evaluation of technologist performance and technical deficiencies that may exist within a radiology practice. Potential solutions such as instituting a checklist for technologists during each acquisition procedure and routine auditing may be required.
More Related Videos
05:37Author Spotlight: A Non-Invasive Tool to Assess and Differentiate Fat Patterns in Liver Using 3D Dixon MRI
Published on: October 20, 2023
08:41Novel In Vivo Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging Techniques for Assessing the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Published on: March 24, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI