Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

119
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
119
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

188
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
188
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

343
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
343
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.7K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.7K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

147
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
147
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of Gestational Age Measurement Technique on the Associations Between Maternal Characteristics and Birth Outcomes.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2026
Same author

Long-Term Association of Cardiovascular Risk Burden With Dementia Risk: The Role of Life-Course Confounders in an Analysis of Cumulative and Specific Factors.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

The osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment gaps among Iranian women aged 50 years and older.

Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders·2026
Same author

Realistic presentation of estimated propensity score in the causal directed acyclic graph-response to Kim.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Revisiting Methodologic Paradigms in Local Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Insights From the SURF Study.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2025
Same author

Interpreting p values and interval estimates based on practical relevance: guidance for the sports medicine clinician.

British journal of sports medicine·2025
Same journal

Re: "Does tattoo exposure increase the risk of cutaneous melanoma? A population-based case-control study".

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Separability and identifiability as primary obstacles to substantively useful mediation analysis.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Intergenerational income mobility and psychotropic drug dispensation in a 1953 Stockholm cohort: a diagonal reference model approach.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Genetic risk score to enhance glaucoma case detection: a prospective double-blind screening study (EyeLife) in the population-based Lifelines cohort.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Different risks, same causes: educational attainment influences when, not from what, we die.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Loneliness around the world: patterns, predictors, and well-being implications.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Case-control matching on confounders revisited.

Mohammad Ali Mansournia1, Charles Poole2

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, PO Box, Tehran, 14155-6446, Iran. mansournia_ma@yahoo.com.

European Journal of Epidemiology
|September 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Matching in case-control studies often creates bias, contrary to previous assumptions. This bias can skew results, especially when multiple confounders are involved, requiring a re-evaluation of matching strategies in epidemiological research.

Keywords:
Case–control studyConfoundingMatchingSelection bias

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.2K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.2K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Case-control studies frequently employ matching to control for confounding variables.
  • Prior theoretical models assumed single confounder matching effectively removes bias under specific monotonic association conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the impact of matching by confounders in case-control studies.
  • To investigate the complex interplay between matching, confounding, and selection bias.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of bias introduced by matching on confounders.
  • Examination of scenarios with single and multiple confounders.
  • Assessment of assumptions regarding monotonic associations.

Main Results:

  • Matching by a confounder nearly always introduces control-selection bias, interacting with confounding to create net bias.
  • Previous assumptions about bias reduction are insufficient, especially when multiple confounders require control.
  • The heuristic that matching brings exposure distributions closer is flawed.

Conclusions:

  • Matching by confounders in case-control studies yields more complex bias than previously understood.
  • Existing methods may require refinement to accurately account for matching-induced bias.
  • Further methodological research is needed to advance bias assessment in matching strategies.