Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Aging on Hippocampal-Dependent Spatial Learning
Published on: February 16, 2024
CAV-enabled data analytics for enhancing adaptive signal control safety environment
1ART-EngineS Transportation Research Laboratory, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0071, USA.
Abstract:
Given the connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) generated trajectories as a "floating sensor" data source to obtain high resolution CAV-generated mobility data at intersections, to ensure maximum safety effect while maintaining efficient operations at the same time is actually a complex task in traffic management. Literature indicates that methods for evaluating the CAV-generated data potentials focusing on safety benefits are still immature. The primary reason lies in lack of underlying mechanism and data models to make the data intelligent to enhance safety environment through adaptive traffic signal control. On top of the developed intelligent CAV-generated mobility data fusion model framework in support of adaptive traffic signal control, parameters and models included in Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM) are integrated to indicate the risk of near crashes and then evaluate the safety environment. A proof-of-concept study is conducted in Uptown Cincinnati, Ohio to test the developed data fusion models in terms of safety enhancement, along with operational benefits. In the tests, the CAV-generated data supported developed adaptive signal plan is compared with the basic signal plans (i.e., pretimed signal plan, actuated signal plan) that supported by traditional detection systems. The results indicate that the adaptive signal plan has a great potential to decrease at most 91% of total collision risk (measured in probability), 71% of crossing collision risk, 90% of rear end collisions risk and 100% of lane-changing collisions risk, compared with basic signal plans. Meanwhile, it increases up to 6.8% of throughput, and decreases up to 91.49% of average delay, 96.23% of queue length and 75.00% of number of stops. The benefits of operation efficiency include reduced average delay and reduced number of stops; but no improvement in reducing collisions severity that is reflected by high maximum speed and relative speed of two vehicles involved in a potential collision.
Related Concept Videos
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Control Systems
At the heart...
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Controller Configurations
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller...
Control Systems: Applications
In modern vehicles, control systems manage various functions to enhance performance and safety. The steering wheel and accelerator are primary inputs in a car's control system. The...
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
The proportional control gain, combined with the...

