Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Genetic risk assessment based on association and prediction studies
Nicole Cathlene N Astrologo1,2, Joverlyn D Gaudillo3,4,5, Jason R Albia6,7,8
1Data Analytics Research Laboratory (DARELab), Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Physics, University of the Philippines Los Baños, 4031, Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines.
Personalized genetic risk models improve prediction of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance. Combining genome-wide association study (GWAS) and machine learning (ML) biomarkers achieved 90% accuracy, aiding in understanding phenotypic emergence and hepatocellular carcinoma risk.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Biomarker Discovery
- Personalized Medicine
Background:
- Genetic factors influence disease risk and progression.
- Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) identify population-level genetic associations.
- Individual-level risk prediction requires complementary approaches like machine learning (ML).
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate personalized risk assessment models for predicting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance.
- To compare the predictive power of GWAS-identified and ML-identified biomarkers.
- To assess the synergistic effect of combining GWAS and ML biomarkers.
Main Methods:
- Utilized single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 200 Korean patients (100 HBsAg seroclearance, 100 high HBsAg).
- Developed risk models using GWAS-identified candidate biomarkers and ML (Random Forest)-identified biomarkers.
- Evaluated model accuracy with individual and combined biomarker sets.
Main Results:
- Models using relevant biomarkers showed higher accuracy than using all features (64%).
- GWAS biomarkers achieved 82% (52 markers) and 71% (3 markers) accuracy.
- ML biomarkers achieved 80% accuracy (150 markers).
- Combining GWAS and ML biomarkers improved predictive accuracy to 90%.
Conclusions:
- Relevant biomarkers significantly influence phenotypic emergence.
- ML serves as a valuable auxiliary analysis to GWAS for enhanced predictive modeling.
- ML-identified biomarkers are linked to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even in HBsAg-negative cases.
More Related Videos
10:17An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
Published on: November 3, 2010
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...