Quantitative flow ratio-based outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation quaestio study

Pierluigi Demola1, Iginio Colaiori1, Davide Bosi1

  • 1Cardiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

PubMed

Insights

Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis identifies coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Positive QFR indicates a higher risk of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events post-TAVI.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent in severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) patients (60-80%).
  • The prognostic significance of coronary lesions in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) candidates is not fully understood.
  • This study investigates long-term outcomes using Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) for CAD assessment in severe AS patients undergoing TAVI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical utility of pre-TAVI Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) for characterizing coronary artery disease (CAD).
  • To assess the association between QFR-defined CAD and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI.
  • To determine if QFR can identify high-risk patients eligible for TAVI.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 439 invasive coronary angiographies from TAVI-eligible patients with symptomatic severe AS.
  • Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis was performed to assess coronary artery lesions.
  • Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoint: composite of cardiovascular mortality, stroke/TIA, AMI, and hospitalization post-TAVI.

Main Results:

  • 20.1% of patients (48/239) had a positive QFR (≤0.80).
  • Positive QFR was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 5.01; 95% CI, 3.17-7.90) after adjustment.
  • QFR positivity in the Left Anterior Descending artery (LAD) was linked to a higher risk of the composite outcome compared to no positive QFR or non-LAD QFR positivity.

Conclusions:

  • Pre-TAVI QFR offers a safe, simple, and wireless method for functional assessment of CAD.
  • QFR can effectively identify patients at high risk for cardiovascular mortality and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE).
  • QFR assessment should be considered by Heart Teams for guiding TAVI patient management.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos