A Primer for Research Scientists on Assessing Mouse Gross and Histopathology Images in the Biomedical Literature

Andrew J Gifford1,2,3

  • 1Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Current Protocols
|September 15, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Research scientists can improve the accuracy of pathology data in mouse models by understanding image quality, composition, and interpretation. This guide helps non-pathologists critically assess pathology images and legends for reliable research findings.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Research
  • Pathology
  • Genomic Technologies

Background:

  • Accurate phenotyping of genetically engineered mouse models is crucial for understanding human diseases.
  • Non-pathologist researchers often perform "do-it-yourself" pathology, increasing the risk of diagnostic errors.
  • Limited guidance exists for creating and interpreting pathology images in research publications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the essential components of an ideal pathology image and figure legend for research publications.
  • To provide guidance for non-pathologist researchers on producing and critically assessing pathology data.
  • To improve the reliability and reproducibility of published pathology data.

Main Methods:

  • Review of best practices for anatomic pathology in mouse models.
  • Detailed explanation of image quality, composition, and interpretation criteria.
  • Emphasis on immunohistochemistry interpretation, including controls and staining characteristics.

Main Results:

  • Identified key elements for ideal pathology images: quality, composition, and interpretation.
  • Highlighted the importance of foundational knowledge in anatomy, histology, and tumor morphology.
  • Provided a checklist for critical examination of pathology images and common pitfalls in immunohistochemistry.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers need foundational knowledge to accurately interpret pathology images and legends.
  • Collaboration with pathologists is encouraged to enhance data accuracy.
  • This guide equips researchers to critically evaluate pathology images, improving research reproducibility.