Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Multiphoton Microscopy of Cleared Mouse Brain Expressing YFP
Published on: September 23, 2012
A Primer for Research Scientists on Assessing Mouse Gross and Histopathology Images in the Biomedical Literature
Andrew J Gifford1,2,3
1Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract:
Advances in genomic technologies have enabled the development of abundant mouse models of human disease, requiring accurate phenotyping to elucidate the consequences of genetic manipulation. Anatomic pathology, an important component of the mouse phenotyping pipeline, is ideally performed by human or veterinary pathologists; however, due to insufficient numbers of pathologists qualified to assess these mouse models morphologically, research scientists may perform "do-it-yourself" pathology, resulting in diagnostic error. In the biomedical literature, pathology data is commonly presented as images of tissue sections, stained with either hematoxylin and eosin or antibodies via immunohistochemistry, accompanied by a figure legend. Data presented in such images and figure legends may contain inaccuracies. Furthermore, there is limited guidance for non-pathologist research scientists concerning the elements required in an ideal pathology image and figure legend in a research publication. In this overview, the components of an ideal pathology image and figure legend are outlined and comprise image quality, image composition, and image interpretation. Background knowledge is important for producing accurate pathology images and critically assessing these images in the literature. This foundational knowledge includes understanding relevant human and mouse anatomy and histology and, for cancer researchers, an understanding of human and mouse tumor classification and morphology, mouse stain background lesions, and tissue processing artifacts. Accurate interpretation of immunohistochemistry is also vitally important and is detailed with emphasis on the requirement for tissue controls and the distribution, intensity, and intracellular location of staining. Common pitfalls in immunohistochemistry interpretation are outlined, and a checklist of questions is provided by which any pathology image may be critically examined. Collaboration with pathologist colleagues is encouraged. This overview aims to equip researchers to critically assess the quality and accuracy of pathology images in the literature to improve the reliability and reproducibility of published pathology data. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Insights
Research scientists can improve the accuracy of pathology data in mouse models by understanding image quality, composition, and interpretation. This guide helps non-pathologists critically assess pathology images and legends for reliable research findings.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Research
- Pathology
- Genomic Technologies
Background:
- Accurate phenotyping of genetically engineered mouse models is crucial for understanding human diseases.
- Non-pathologist researchers often perform "do-it-yourself" pathology, increasing the risk of diagnostic errors.
- Limited guidance exists for creating and interpreting pathology images in research publications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the essential components of an ideal pathology image and figure legend for research publications.
- To provide guidance for non-pathologist researchers on producing and critically assessing pathology data.
- To improve the reliability and reproducibility of published pathology data.
Main Methods:
- Review of best practices for anatomic pathology in mouse models.
- Detailed explanation of image quality, composition, and interpretation criteria.
- Emphasis on immunohistochemistry interpretation, including controls and staining characteristics.
Main Results:
- Identified key elements for ideal pathology images: quality, composition, and interpretation.
- Highlighted the importance of foundational knowledge in anatomy, histology, and tumor morphology.
- Provided a checklist for critical examination of pathology images and common pitfalls in immunohistochemistry.
Conclusions:
- Researchers need foundational knowledge to accurately interpret pathology images and legends.
- Collaboration with pathologists is encouraged to enhance data accuracy.
- This guide equips researchers to critically evaluate pathology images, improving research reproducibility.

