Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

10:32
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
18.5K
Development and internal validation of a screening tool for chronic prostatitis (S-CP).
Yoichiro Tohi1, Yasukazu Hijikata2,3, Mikio Sugimoto4
1Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-Cho, Kita-Gun, Kagawa, 761-0701, Japan.
World Journal of Urology
|September 15, 2023
Summary
A new self-checkable screening tool for chronic prostatitis (S-CP) was developed and validated. This tool helps men with potential chronic prostatitis symptoms consult urologists for early diagnosis and management.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Public Health
- Diagnostic Tool Development
Background:
- Chronic prostatitis affects a significant number of men, often leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment.
- A simple, accessible screening method is needed to encourage early consultation with urologists.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a simple self-checkable screening tool for chronic prostatitis (S-CP).
- To encourage men with potential chronic prostatitis symptoms to seek professional medical advice.
Main Methods:
- An expert panel developed the S-CP tool with three domains: pain, accompanying symptoms, and triggers.
- Logistic regression was used to predict chronic prostatitis prevalence based on S-CP scores.
- The tool's predictive performance was evaluated using data from a national survey of Japanese men aged 20-84.
Main Results:
- The S-CP demonstrated an optimism-adjusted area under the curve of 0.761, indicating reasonable predictive performance.
- With a cutoff of two positive domains, the S-CP achieved 62.0% sensitivity and 85.4% specificity.
- Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.2 and 0.45, respectively, with high negative predictive value (99.4%).
Conclusions:
- The S-CP shows promise as a first-step screening tool for identifying individuals with chronic prostatitis in the general population.
- Further research is recommended to develop diagnostic support tools for clinical settings.

