External validation of the pediatric International IgA Nephropathy Prediction Tool in a central China cohort

Daojing Ying1, Mengke Lu1, Yuanzhao Zhi1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.

PubMed

Insights

The pediatric International IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) Prediction Tool needs improvement. While the model without race identified highest-risk patients, overall discrimination and calibration were unsatisfactory for predicting kidney disease progression in children.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Pediatric Nephrology
  • Clinical Epidemiology

Background:

  • The International IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) Prediction Tool, adapted from adult data, requires external validation in pediatric populations.
  • Idiopathic IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) is a significant cause of chronic kidney disease in children.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To externally validate the updated pediatric International IgA Nephropathy (IgAN) Prediction Tool.
  • To assess the tool's ability to predict kidney disease progression in a contemporary cohort of children with IgAN.

Main Methods:

  • External validation of the IgAN Prediction Tool in 439 children with biopsy-confirmed idiopathic IgAN.
  • Primary outcome: 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end-stage kidney disease.
  • Evaluation of discrimination (C-index, ROC curve) and calibration (calibration plots) for models with and without race.

Main Results:

  • The cohort had milder proteinuria and lower IgAN lesion severity compared to previously reported studies.
  • Discrimination (C-index, AUC) was below 0.7 at 5 years for both models, indicating poor predictive performance.
  • Both models generally overestimated the risk of kidney disease progression, with unsatisfactory calibration.

Conclusions:

  • The IgAN Prediction Tool, even without race adjustment, showed limited ability to accurately stratify risk in this pediatric cohort.
  • The model without race demonstrated some ability to distinguish the highest-risk group but overall performance was unsatisfactory.
  • External validation revealed suboptimal discrimination and calibration, suggesting the need for further refinement of prediction tools for pediatric IgAN.
Abstract