Clinical Validation of a Primary Antibody Deficiency Screening Algorithm for Primary Care

Marianne A Messelink1, Paco M J Welsing2, Giovanna Devercelli3

  • 1Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. m.a.messelink@umcutrecht.nl.

PubMed

Insights

A new screening algorithm effectively identifies patients with primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) in primary care, reducing diagnostic delays. This validated tool significantly increases PAD detection rates compared to the general population.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Primary Care Medicine
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Diagnostic delay in primary antibody deficiencies (PADs) leads to severe health consequences and increased costs.
  • Early detection of PADs is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
  • A screening algorithm was previously developed to aid early PAD detection in primary care settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clinically validate and optimize a screening algorithm for early detection of primary antibody deficiencies (PADs).
  • To apply the algorithm to a large primary care electronic health record (EHR) database in the Netherlands.

Main Methods:

  • The screening algorithm was applied to 61,172 EHRs.
  • High-scoring EHRs underwent exclusion screening, followed by serum immunoglobulin analysis for eligible patients.
  • The algorithm was refitted using high-risk patient data to enhance efficiency.

Main Results:

  • The study identified 10 new PAD patients, significantly increasing the detection rate (approx. 1:10) compared to the general population (1:1700-1:25,000).
  • Refitting the algorithm improved its performance (AUC-ROC 0.80).
  • A proposed two-step screening process involves initial broad screening followed by optimized selection for laboratory analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The validated screening algorithm successfully reduces diagnostic delay for primary antibody deficiencies in primary care.
  • The optimized algorithm and proposed two-step process enhance screening efficiency.
  • Further validation in diverse populations and cost-effectiveness analyses are recommended.
Abstract