Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025
Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020
Postural control measured before and after simulated ankle inversion landings among individuals with chronic ankle
Minsub Oh1, Hyunwook Lee1, Seunguk Han1
1Department of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.
Background:
Postural control measured during single-leg stance and single-leg hop stabilization has been used to estimate sensorimotor function in CAI individuals and copers. To date, studies have not used postural control tasks as a way of measuring responses to sudden changes in sensory information after simulated ankle inversion landings.
Research Question:
A cross-sectional study was performed to identify any differences in static and dynamic postural control before and after simulated ankle inversion landings among individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI), copers, and healthy controls.
Methods:
Nineteen CAI individuals, 19 copers, and 19 controls participated in this study. Participants performed 3 static and dynamic balance tasks before and after simulated ankle inversion landings onto a 25° tilted platform from a height of 30 cm. The main outcome measures were the center of pressure (COP) velocity and range from the single-leg stance, as well as the dynamic postural stability index from the single-leg hop stabilization. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare posttest and pretest differences in static and dynamic postural control between groups.
Results:
In the static postural control measures, the CAI group had a higher difference in COP velocity and COP range in the frontal plane (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05, respectively) than the coper group. In the dynamic postural control measures, the CAI group demonstrated a higher difference in the vertical stability index (p < 0.05) than the healthy control group.
Significance:
CAI individuals have persistent worse postural control after somatosensory modulation due to their inability to adapt to sudden somatosensory modulation. Relative to CAI individuals, copers may have different abilities not only the integration of somatosensory input about ankle inversion modulation, but also the adaptation of the entire motor control system, preventing recurrent ankle sprains after an initial LAS. Therefore, somatosensory modulation may be the indicator of understanding CAI and coper.
