Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Outcomes of Severe Mitral Stenosis With the Revised Severity Criteria: Mitral Valve Replacement vs Percutaneous
Dae-Young Kim1, Iksung Cho2, Kyu Kim2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea.
Background:
This study aimed to compare the outcomes, according to percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) vs mitral valve replacement (MVR), of severe mitral stenosis (MS) with the updated criteria (MVA ≤ 1.5 cm2).
Methods:
From the Multicenter Mitral Stenosis With Rheumatic Etiology (MASTER) registry of 3140 patients, we included patients with severe MS who underwent PMV or MVR between January 2000 and December 2021 except for previous valvular surgery/intervention, at least moderate other valvular dysfunction, and thrombus at the left atrium/appendage. Moderately severe MS (MS-MS) and very severe MS (VS-MS) were defined as 1.0 cm2 < MVA ≤ 1.5 cm2 and MVA ≤ 1.0 cm2, respectively. Primary outcomes were a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were a composite of primary outcomes and redo intervention.
Results:
Among 442 patients (mean 56.5 ±11.9 years, women 77.1%), the MVR group (n = 260) was older, had more comorbidities, higher echoscore, larger left chambers, and higher right ventricular systolic pressure than the PMV group (n = 182). During a mean follow-up of 6.9 ± 5.2 years with inverse probability-weighted matching, primary outcomes did not differ, but the MVR group experienced fewer secondary outcomes (P = 0.010). In subgroup analysis of patients with MS-MS and VS-MS, primary outcomes did not differ. However, the MVR group in patients with VS-MS showed better secondary outcomes (P = 0.012).
Conclusions:
PMV or MVR did not influence CV mortality or HF hospitalization in both MS-MS and VS-MS. However, because of increased early redo intervention in the PMV group in VS-MS, MVR would be the preferable option without clear evidence of suitable morphology for PMV.
Insights
Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) showed similar cardiovascular outcomes for severe mitral stenosis (MS). However, MVR was preferable for very severe MS due to fewer redo interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Severe mitral stenosis (MS) diagnosis updated criteria: MVA ≤ 1.5 cm².
- Rheumatic etiology is a common cause of MS.
- Comparison of percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty (PMV) versus mitral valve replacement (MVR) is crucial for guiding treatment decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes of PMV versus MVR in severe MS using updated criteria.
- To evaluate the efficacy of PMV and MVR in different severity subgroups (moderately severe MS and very severe MS).
- To determine the optimal intervention strategy based on patient characteristics and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Multicenter Mitral Stenosis With Rheumatic Etiology (MASTER) registry data.
- Inclusion of 442 patients with severe MS undergoing PMV or MVR between 2000-2021.
- Inverse probability-weighted matching for comparing primary (CV death, HF hospitalization) and secondary (primary outcomes + redo intervention) endpoints.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in primary outcomes between PMV and MVR groups across all severe MS patients.
- MVR group showed significantly fewer secondary outcomes (P=0.010) compared to PMV.
- In very severe MS subgroup, MVR demonstrated better secondary outcomes (P=0.012) with fewer redo interventions.
Conclusions:
- Neither PMV nor MVR significantly impacted cardiovascular mortality or heart failure hospitalizations in moderately severe MS or very severe MS.
- Mitral valve replacement is recommended for very severe MS, especially when PMV morphology is not clearly suitable, due to a lower rate of early redo interventions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

