Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.0K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

8.7K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
8.7K
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

5.3K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
5.3K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.0K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.0K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correcting the Variance of Effect Sizes Based on Binary Outcomes for Clustering.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Computing Statistical Power for the Difference in Differences Design.

Evaluation review·2025
Same author

Effect sizes for experimental research.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2025
Same author

Interpretation of the Standardized Mean Difference Effect Size When Distributions Are Not Normal or Homoscedastic.

Educational and psychological measurement·2024
Same author

ABkPowerCalculator: An App to Compute Power for Balanced (AB)<sup>k</sup> Single Case Experimental Designs.

Multivariate behavioral research·2023
Same author

Effect sizes in ANCOVA and difference-in-differences designs.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2023
Same journal

Prompt engineering of large language models for paper screening in medical meta-analyses and systematic reviews: A prospective comparative study - CORRIGENDUM.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

A comparison of preprint search aggregators: comprehensive identification of preprints in the information retrieval stage of evidence syntheses.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Meta-research on key metrics of preregistered scoping reviews.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Facilitators and barriers to engaging patient partners in knowledge syntheses: A stage-based approach.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same journal

Response to: Five methodological considerations for validating LLMs in risk of bias assessment.

Research synthesis methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

581

Robust variance estimation in small meta-analysis with the standardized mean difference.

Rrita Zejnullahi1,2, Larry V Hedges3

  • 1Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Research Synthesis Methods
|September 17, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Conventional random-effects models in meta-analysis have inaccurate confidence intervals for small sample sizes. New variance estimators and degree of freedom adjustments improve small-sample meta-analysis accuracy.

Keywords:
education policyeffect sizeresearch clearinghouserobust standard errorsmall meta-analysis

More Related Videos

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

71.2K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

581
Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI
06:26

Meta-analysis of Voxel-Based Neuroimaging Studies using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images SDM-PSI

Published on: November 27, 2019

71.2K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Meta-Analysis

Background:

  • Conventional random-effects models in meta-analysis often use large sample approximations.
  • These models may produce confidence intervals that are too narrow for small sample sizes, affecting accuracy.
  • Accuracy is influenced by sample size configuration, heterogeneity, and the number of studies.

Approach:

  • Introduce two novel variance estimators designed for improved small sample properties.
  • Investigate the effectiveness of various degrees of freedom adjustments for confidence interval computation.
  • Utilize simulation studies to rigorously evaluate the performance of the proposed methods.

Key Points:

  • Demonstrates inadequacy of conventional random-effects models in small sample meta-analysis.
  • Proposes alternative variance estimators with superior small sample performance.
  • Evaluates degrees of freedom adjustments for enhanced confidence interval accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The developed variance estimators and degree of freedom adjustments offer improved accuracy for small sample meta-analyses.
  • These advancements address limitations of conventional methods, leading to more reliable summary effect estimates.
  • Simulation results support the effectiveness of the proposed techniques in small sample scenarios.