Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Confidence is predicted by pre- and post-choice decision signal dynamics
John P Grogan1,2, Wouter Rys1, Simon P Kelly3
1School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Post-choice evidence accumulation, measured by electrophysiological signatures, continues when certainty is low, impacting choice confidence. This finding supports certainty-dependent stopping theories of decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Decision-Making Research
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Choice confidence is known to be affected by post-commitment evidence.
- The precise neural mechanisms of post-choice evidence sampling remain poorly understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the electrophysiological dynamics of evidence accumulation and motor preparation after a choice.
- To determine how these neural signatures relate to confidence in perceptual decisions.
Main Methods:
- Traced electrophysiological signatures, including Centro-parietal Positivity (CPP) and mu/beta band activity, during pre- and post-choice periods.
- Analyzed neural data in relation to participants' confidence reports and decision outcomes, including changes of mind.
Main Results:
- Pre-choice CPP amplitudes correlated with confidence, even without immediate feedback.
- Post-choice, CPP showed sustained activity, particularly with lower certainty in the endorsed choice, regardless of decision changes.
- Lower certainty was associated with delayed motor preparation signals and slower confidence reports.
Conclusions:
- Findings support certainty-dependent stopping theories, where evidence accumulation persists until a confidence threshold is met.
- These results offer insights into the neural basis of choice confidence and decision-making processes.
More Related Videos
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
10:50Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
Published on: June 6, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Hindsight Biases
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Classification of Signals
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...