Heterogeneity and potential therapeutic insights for triple-negative breast cancer based on metabolic-associated

Lijuan Li1, Nan Wu1, Gaojian Zhuang2

  • 1Department of Cancer Prevention Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, China.

Frontiers in Pharmacology
|September 18, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) can be classified into two metabolic subtypes. One subtype shows promise for PD-1 inhibitor therapy, while the other has poor prognosis and distinct mutations.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Metabolic Reprogramming
  • Cancer Heterogeneity

Background:

  • Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge due to its poor prognosis and lack of effective treatments.
  • Metabolic reprogramming is a key hallmark of cancer, influencing tumorigenesis, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response.
  • Understanding TNBC's metabolic heterogeneity is crucial for developing targeted therapies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To categorize metabolic patterns within TNBC to address its heterogeneity.
  • To identify distinct TNBC subtypes based on metabolic characteristics.
  • To provide a foundation for targeted therapeutic strategies in TNBC.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data from 115 TNBC patients to form a virtual cohort.
  • Identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and applied analyses to five independent datasets for subtype verification.
  • Evaluated subtypes based on prognosis, metabolic features, immune infiltration, clinical characteristics, somatic mutations, and drug sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • Identified two distinct metabolic subtypes of TNBC: C1 and C2.
  • C1 exhibited high immune checkpoint gene expression and sensitivity to PD-1 inhibitors.
  • C2 showed significant metabolic pathway variations, lacked immune signatures, had a late pathological stage, low immune infiltration, poor prognosis, and activated PI3K/angiogenesis pathways with specific mutations (PIK3CA, KMT2D, KMT2C).
  • Developed a 100-gene classifier and identified AKR1B10 as a potential biomarker for C2 subtypes.

Conclusions:

  • Two TNBC subtypes with distinct metabolic phenotypes were identified, offering new insights into TNBC heterogeneity.
  • The findings provide a theoretical basis for developing novel therapeutic strategies.
  • AKR1B10 may serve as a predictive biomarker for the C2 subtype.