Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Evaluation of a Reliable Biomarker in a Cecal Ligation and Puncture-Induced Mouse Model of Sepsis
Published on: December 9, 2022
Clinical evaluation of Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 in infective endocarditis
Qi Wang1, Bingqi Fu1, Peihang Hu2
1Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Insights
The Sepsis-3 criteria better predict mortality in infective endocarditis (IE) patients than Sepsis-1. This study found Sepsis-3 independently associated with higher in-hospital and 6-month mortality risks in IE patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Sepsis significantly impacts survival outcomes in infective endocarditis (IE) patients.
- The predictive value of current sepsis definitions (Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3) for IE mortality remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 criteria in predicting mortality among patients with infective endocarditis.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 1354 IE patients was analyzed, categorized by Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 criteria.
- Multivariate regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were employed to assess mortality risk prediction.
Main Results:
- Sepsis-3 identified a higher proportion of patients (36.6%) compared to Sepsis-1 (25.6%).
- Both criteria significantly correlated with 6-month mortality, but Sepsis-3 demonstrated stronger independent association with in-hospital (OR 2.89) and 6-month mortality (HR 3.24).
Conclusions:
- The Sepsis-3 criteria exhibit superior predictive performance for mortality risk in infective endocarditis patients compared to Sepsis-1.
- Sepsis-3 is a more effective tool for risk stratification in IE management.
Background:
Sepsis is associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with infective endocarditis (IE). However, the prognostic value of the Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 criteria of sepsis for IE patients is unclear.
Methods:
A total of 1354 patients with IE was enrolled and classified into the sepsis and non-sepsis groups according to the Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to test the predictive performances of the Sepsis-1 and Sepsis-3 in assessing the risk of mortality in patients with IE.
Results:
Sepsis was diagnosed in 347 (25.6%) patients according to the Sepsis-1 and 496 (36.6%) patients with the Sepsis-3. The in-hospital mortality rate was 11.5% in the Sepsis-1 group and 14.3% in the Sepsis-3 group. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that both Sepsis-1 (Log-rank = 17.2, p < 0.001) and Sepsis-3 (Log-rank = 94.3, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with 6-month mortality. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the Sepsis-3 was independently associated with the in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 2.89, 95% CI 1.68-4.97, p < 0.001) and the 6-month mortality (hazard ratio = 3.24, 95% CI 2.08-5.04, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Sepsis-3 shows better predictive performance than Sepsis-1 criteria in assessing the risk of mortality in patients with IE.
More Related Videos
06:28Endotoxin Activity Assay for the Detection of Whole Blood Endotoxemia in Critically Ill Patients
Published on: June 24, 2019
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies