Multiple Myeloma in Young Patients: A Scoping Review

Mary Steinbach1, Karun Neupane2, Muhammad Aziz3

  • 1Division of Hematology and Hematologic Malignancies, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

PubMed

Insights

Younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM) lack sufficient research data. This review highlights the heterogeneity in defining young MM patients and identifies critical unmet needs for future studies.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Limited data exists on the disease course, presentation, outcomes, and prognosis for younger multiple myeloma (MM) patients.
  • Historically, younger MM patients were presumed to have better outcomes due to treatment tolerance and fewer comorbidities, but a precise age definition is lacking.
  • Inconsistent data reporting necessitates a comprehensive review of existing research on young MM patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a scoping review of current research on young patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
  • To identify and highlight research gaps and unmet needs concerning this demographic.
  • To propose age-based categorizations for future research: young adults (<50), mid-life adults (50-65), and older adults (65+).

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive scoping review was performed across multiple databases: Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE.
  • Search terms encompassed a broad range of concepts related to young patients with MM.
  • A total of 201 studies were included and categorized by age group, patient numbers, outcomes, comparators, and study location.

Main Results:

  • The review identified significant heterogeneity in the definition and description of young MM patients across studies.
  • A notable lack of research specifically addresses the unique needs and characteristics of younger MM patient populations.
  • The categorization revealed distinct age groups: young adults with MM (<50), mid-life adults with MM (50-65), and older adults with MM (65+).

Conclusions:

  • There is a considerable heterogeneity in defining and describing young patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
  • Current research inadequately addresses the specific needs of younger individuals diagnosed with MM.
  • Future research should focus on the unique aspects of MM in younger populations, guided by defined age categories.