Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
Vomiting, Pyloric Mass, and Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Diagnostic Test Accuracy for Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis-A
Jeffrey Hom1, Samuel H F Lam2, Kristen M Delaney3
1Department of Pediatrics, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; Department of Emergency Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Insights
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and palpating a pyloric mass are highly accurate for diagnosing hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infants. Vomiting is a less reliable indicator, showing lower diagnostic test measures.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Infant Health
Background:
- Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is a frequent cause of nonbilious vomiting in infants under six months.
- The diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for HPS has not been previously compared.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare the diagnostic test accuracy of POCUS, palpation of a pyloric mass, and infant history of vomiting for HPS.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted from 1977 to March 2022.
- Diagnostic accuracy of POCUS, palpation, and vomiting were evaluated using bivariate analysis.
- Bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Main Results:
- POCUS demonstrated high sensitivity (97.7%) and specificity (94.1%) for HPS detection.
- Palpation of a pyloric mass showed a sensitivity of 73.5% and high specificity (97.5%).
- Vomiting had a sensitivity of 91.3% but lower specificity (60.8%). Both POCUS and palpation had high positive likelihood ratios (LR+).
Conclusions:
- POCUS and palpation of a pyloric mass are highly specific and reliable diagnostic methods for HPS.
- Vomiting alone is a less accurate diagnostic indicator for HPS compared to POCUS and palpation.
Background:
Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis is a common cause of nonbilious vomiting in infants younger than 6 months. Its history, physical examination, and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) have not been compared for their diagnostic test accuracy.
Objective:
The aim of this systematic review was to quantify and compare the diagnostic test accuracy of a history of vomiting, a pyloric mass on palpation, and POCUS.
Methods:
We performed three searches of the literature from 1977 to March 2022. We evaluated bias using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy-2) tool. We performed a bivariate analysis.
Results:
From 5369 citations, we identified 14 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. We quantified three diagnostic elements: POCUS, a pyloric mass on palpation, and vomiting. We identified five studies that analyzed POCUS, which included 329 patients. POCUS had a sensitivity of 97.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 93.1-99.3%) and a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI 88.7-97.1%) for detecting pyloric stenosis. We identified six studies that analyzed the presence of a pyloric mass, which included 628 patients. The palpation of a pyloric mass had a sensitivity of 73.5% (95% CI 62.6-82.1%) and a specificity of 97.5% (95% CI 93.8-99.0%). We identified four studies that analyzed vomiting, which included 355 patients. Vomiting had a sensitivity of 91.3% (95% CI 82.1-96.0) and a specificity of 60.8% (95% CI 8.5-96.3). Both POCUS and palpation of a pyloric mass had a high positive likelihood ratio (LR+: 17 and 33, respectively). The LR+ for vomiting was 5.0.
Conclusions:
Both POCUS and palpable mass had high specificity and positive LR, whereas vomiting provided the lowest diagnostic test measures.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

