Clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients implanted with a transvenous or subcutaneous defibrillator
Pietro Francia1, Matteo Ziacchi2, Carmen Adduci1
1Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Insights
Subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients show a lower risk of ICD therapies and lead complications compared to transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs). Long-term studies are needed to confirm survival benefits.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for preventing sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients.
- Complications associated with transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs) are a significant concern.
- Subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) offer a leadless alternative, potentially reducing complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of S-ICDs versus TV-ICDs in HCM patients.
- To evaluate differences in ICD interventions, complications, adverse events, and mortality between S-ICD and TV-ICD recipients.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study of consecutive HCM patients implanted with either S-ICD (n=216) or TV-ICD (n=211).
- Analysis using propensity-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard ratios.
- Comparison of 5-year event-free survival and risks of various adverse outcomes.
Main Results:
- S-ICD patients demonstrated a significantly lower 5-year risk of both appropriate (HR: 0.32) and inappropriate (HR: 0.44) ICD interventions.
- The risk of major lead-related complications was substantially lower in the S-ICD group (HR: 0.17).
- Rates of device-related complications, disease-related complications, and mortality were similar between S-ICD and TV-ICD groups at 5 years.
Conclusions:
- S-ICDs in HCM patients are associated with a reduced risk of ICD therapies and major lead-related complications compared to TV-ICDs.
- Further long-term follow-up is necessary to determine if reduced lead complications translate to improved morbidity and survival benefits.
Aims:
The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a life-saving therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) at risk of sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator complications are of concern. The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) does not use transvenous leads and is expected to reduce complications. However, it does not provide bradycardia and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP). The aim of this study was to compare appropriate and inappropriate ICD interventions, complications, disease-related adverse events and mortality between HCM patients implanted with a S- or transvenous (TV)-ICD.
Methods And Results:
Consecutive HCM patients implanted with a S- (n = 216) or TV-ICD (n = 211) were enrolled. Propensity-adjusted cumulative Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to compare 5-year event-free survival and the risk of events. The S-ICD patients had lower 5-year risk of appropriate (HR: 0.32; 95%CI: 0.15-0.65; P = 0.002) and inappropriate (HR: 0.44; 95%CI: 0.20-0.95; P = 0.038) ICD interventions, driven by a high incidence of ATP therapy in the TV-ICD group. The S- and TV-ICD patients experienced similar 5-year rate of device-related complications, albeit the risk of major lead-related complications was lower in S-ICD patients (HR: 0.17; 95%CI: 0.038-0.79; P = 0.023). The TV- and S-ICD patients displayed similar risk of disease-related complications (HR: 0.64; 95%CI: 0.27-1.52; P = 0.309) and mortality (HR: 0.74; 95%CI: 0.29-1.87; P = 0.521).
Conclusion:
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients implanted with a S-ICD had lower 5-year risk of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies as well as of major lead-related complications as compared to those implanted with a TV-ICD. Long-term comparative follow-up studies will clarify whether the lower incidence of major lead-related complications will translate into a morbidity or survival benefit.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification


