Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Tests for hepatotoxicity: usefulness in screening workers.

C H Tamburro, G M Liss

Journal of Occupational Medicine. : Official Publication of the Industrial Medical Association

|October 1, 1986

Summary

Selecting comprehensive hepatotoxicity tests is crucial for identifying all seven liver damage types. This review covers traditional, newer, and developing diagnostic methods for occupational health screening and monitoring.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Ontario Workplace Health Champions Program.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2024

Same author

Comparison of clinic models for patients with work-related asthma.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2017

Same author

Work-exacerbated asthma in a workers' compensation population.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2014

Same author

Occupational contact allergens: are they also associated with occupational asthma?

American journal of industrial medicine·2012

Same author

Symptoms after mould exposure including Stachybotrys chartarum, and comparison with darkroom disease.

Allergy·2009

Same author

Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2005

Area of Science:

Toxicology and Occupational Health
Hepatology and Diagnostic Medicine

Background:

The liver's complex functions necessitate a multi-faceted approach to assessing hepatotoxicity.
Existing diagnostic methods vary in their ability to detect the full spectrum of liver injury.

Purpose of the Study:

To review and categorize diagnostic tests for evaluating liver toxicity.
To assess the utility of traditional, newer, and developing tests for medical screening and biological monitoring.
To discuss the practical application and implications of hepatotoxicity testing in occupational settings.

Main Methods:

Review of traditional diagnostic studies (e.g., enzymes, proteins) focusing on specificity, sensitivity, selectivity, and cost-effectiveness.
Evaluation of the status of newer tests, including clearance, radioisotopic assays, and imaging scans.
Introduction of emerging molecular and genetic tests for occupational health surveillance.

Main Results:

No single test can identify all seven types of hepatotoxicity; a combination of tests is required.
Traditional tests offer a baseline but have limitations in specificity and sensitivity for all injury types.
Newer and developing tests show promise for improved detection and characterization of liver damage.

Conclusions:

A comprehensive panel of tests, integrating various methodologies (blood, urine, imaging, genetic), is essential for effective hepatotoxicity assessment.
The selection and application of diagnostic tools must consider clinical evaluation, interpretation, and triage for optimal patient management.
Understanding the medical and socioeconomic implications of hepatotoxicity testing is vital for initial screening and ongoing monitoring.

Related Experiment Videos