Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
A closer look at how symmetry constraints and the spin-orbit coupling shape the electronic structure of Bi(111)
Marisol Alcántara Ortigoza1, Talat S Rahman2
1Department of Physics, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee Institute, Tuskegee, AL 36088, United States of America.
Abstract:
Fully relativistic density-functional-theory calculations of Bi(111) thin films are analyzed to revisit their two metallic surface-states branches. We first contrast these metallic branches with surface states arising at gaps in the valence band opened by the spin-orbit coupling (SOC). We find that the two metallic branches alongΓM‾do not overlap with the bulk band at the zone boundary,M. We show that the spin texture observed in such states cannot be traced to the lifting of Kramers' degeneracy. Instead, we track them to themj=±1/2-mj=±3/2SOC splitting, the potential anisotropy for in-plane and out-of-plane states, and the coupling between the opposite surfaces of a slab occurring nearM, which is driven by a spatial redistribution of the four metallic states composing the two metallic branches. Each of these branches appears to be non-degenerate at the tested surface, yet each is degenerate with another state of opposite spin at the other surface. Nevertheless, the four metallic states bear some contribution on both surfaces of the film because of their spatial redistribution nearM. The overlapping among these states nearM, afforded by their spatial redistribution on both surfaces, causes a hybridization that perpetuates the splitting between the two branches, makes the film's electronic structure thickness dependent nearM, extinguishes the magnetic moment of the metallic states avoiding the magnetic-moment discontinuity atM, and denies the need or expectancy of the metallic branches becoming degenerate atM. We propose that theoppositespin polarization observed for the two metallic branches occurs because the surface atoms retain their covalent bonds and thus cannot afford magnetic polarization. We show that the Rashba-splitting of the metallic states for inversion-asymmetric films does not have a fixed magnitude but can be tuned by changing the perturbation breaking inversion symmetry.
More Related Videos
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
06:49Radio Frequency Magnetron Sputtering of GdBa2Cu3O7âˆ'ÃŽ ´/ La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 Quasi-bilayer Films on SrTiO3 STO Single-crystal Substrates
Published on: April 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Molecular Orbital Theory II
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
The Pauli Exclusion Principle
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview
Valence Bond Theory